Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/13/83

Baiju.M. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Ring Cell, Mubarak Masjid Building - Opp.Party(s)

Sajid Kammadam, Kasaragod

26 Nov 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/83
 
1. Baiju.M.
S/o.Bhaskaran Vaidyar, Near Saraswathi Vidyalaya, Poinachi. Po.Thekkil
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s.Ring Cell, Mubarak Masjid Building
NH.17,Poinachi, thekkil, Kasaragod Taluk & dist. Rep. by its Manager
Kasaragod
Kerala
2. M/s.Vodafone India Ltd
Peninsula Corporate Park, Hutch House,A&B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel Mumbai. 400013 Rep. by its Manager
Mumbai
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

D.o.F: 15/03/2013

D.o.O:26/11/2013

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                          CC.NO.83/13

                  Dated this, the 26th   day of  November 2013

 

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI           : PRESIDENT

SMT.BEENA K.G               : MEMBER

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER

 

 

 

Mr. Baiju.M., S/o Baskaran Vaidyar,

Near Saraswathi Vidyalaya, Poinachi,

P.O-Thekkil – 671541, Kasaragod.                                    : Complainant

(Adv.Shajidi Kammadam)

 

 

1.M/s. Ring Cell, Mubarak Masjid Building,

NH – 17, Poinachi, P.O-Thekkil, Kasaragod

Rep by its Manager

2.M/s Vodafone India Ltd.,                                                   : Opposite parties

Peninsula Corporate Park, Hutch House,

A & B Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel,

Mumbai – 400013 Rep by its Manager.

 

 

 

                                                                       ORDER

SMT.P.RAMADEVI     : PRESIDENT

 

        Complainant filed this complaint alleging deficiency in service against opposite parties.  The dispute is relating to Telecom services.

   In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in General Manager Telecom vs. M.Krishnan and  another (2009 SCC 481) the Consumer Forum have no jurisdiction to entertain the  complaint  relating to Telecom services.  Hence  the complaint is dismissed for  want of  jurisdiction.

MEMBER                                      MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT

eva

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.