Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/145/2018

M.S.Ram,Mrs. Rajini Pillai - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Prince Jewellery rep by its Managing Director - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.C.D.John son

30 May 2022

ORDER

                                                 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI (NORTH)

@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

 

PRESENT : THIRU. G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L.,                            :PRESIDENT

                                  TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E.,                           : MEMBER-I

                        THIRU.V.RAMAMURTHY,B.A.,B.L.,PGDLA.,    :MEMBER-II

                      

MONDAY THE 20th   DAY OF JUNE 2022

C.C.NO.145/2018

 

  1. M.S.Ram,

S/o.S.Mathevan Pillai,

  1. Rajini Pillai,

W/o.M.S.Ram,

206/1, Phase I, Adarsh Palm Meadows,

Airport-Whitefield Road,

Ramanagoodanahalli,

Bangalore-560 066.                                                                                                                                                                          …..Complainant

 ..Vs..

M/s. Prince Jewellery,

Rep. By its Managing Director,

No.12, Nageswara Rao Road,

Panagal park,

T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017.

 

                                                                                                                                     .....Opposite Party

 

 

 

Counsel for Complainant                          : M/s.C.D.Johnson, M.L., and 2 others

 

Counsel for  opposite party                        : M/s.M.B. Gopalan and 2 others

 

ORDER

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,

          This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.

          The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite party to return Gold retained as wastage and to pay Rs.12,813/- levied as making charge, and to award a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards the mental agony, shock and loss of happiness experienced by the complainant due to deficiency of service and unfair trade practice adopted by the opposite party and for cost.

          Complainant present.  Opposite party present. Order copy produced F.A.No.245/2009 allowed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai thereby setting aside the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai(North) order and the complaint has dismissed.  No further appeal preferred.  Hence no useful purpose in keeping this CC.No.145/2018(Renumbered) pending.  Hence this C.C. is closed.

Order Pronounced dated 20th  June  2022.

 

MEMBER – I            MEMBER – II                                              PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.