Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/408/2015

M/s.Maganlal.S Shah - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Pratishta Associates - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Sree Sun Associates and Vijay Anand

20 Dec 2019

ORDER

                                                                              Date of filing      : 27.10.2015                                                                     Date of disposal  : 20.12.2019

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                     : PRESIDENT

TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP.  :  MEMBER

 

C.C. No.408/2015

DATED THIS FRIDAY THE 20^TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019

1. Mr. Maganlal. S. Shah,

S/o. Mr. Savji. V. Shah,

 

2. Kamlesh. M. Shah,

S/o. Mr. Maganlal. S. Shah,

Flat No.D-302, 3^rd Floor,

Brindavan Apartments,

No.67, Cross Road,

New Washermenpet,

Chennai – 600 081.                                                     .. Complainants.

..Versus.. 

 

1. M/s. Pratishta Associates,

Rep. by its Partner

Mrs. B.V. Manjula,

Regd. office at:-

Flat No.S-13, TNHB Complex,

No.4/180, Luz Church Road,

Mylapore,

Chennai – 600 004.

 

2. M/s. Advaita Homes,

Rep. by its Authorised Signatory

Mr. B. Raja Reddy,

Regd. office at:-

Flat No.7, 1^st Floor, Archana Complex,

No.10, Sarangapani Street,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.                                                 .. Opposite parties.

 

 Counsel for the complainants     : M/s. Sree Sun Associates &  

                                                        another

Counsel for the opposite parties : M/s. P. Subba Reddy & others

 

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainants against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 prays to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- by way of non-completion of project in time and for not providing the amenities as assured in the Developer Agreement especially the Swimming pool and also for disturbing complainant’s U.D.S. share in the land on the part of the opposite parties as per solemn assurance given by them in the Developer agreement dated:18.06.2012 and to pay a sum of Rs.9,00,000/- towards compensation for deficiency in service, mental agony, strain, stress and financial loss and cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the complainant.

Proof Affidavit of both complainants and opposite parties not filed for a long time to prove the allegations raised in the complaint and contentions raised in the written version.   The complainant has not taken any step for the 1^st complainant also.   Hence, this case is dismissed for default.

Dated this Friday the 20^th day of December 2019.

 

 

MEMBER                                                                                                                                                                                         PRESIDENT