Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/354/2016

Jaslin Gargi Finance of vivin Rathna - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Power Super Bikes - Opp.Party(s)

K.Ram kumar and Ramesh

16 Nov 2018

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 17.10.2016                                                                          Date of Order  : 16.11.2018

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K. AMALA, M.A., L.L.B.                           :  MEMBER-I

   

C.C. No.354/2016

DATED THIS FRIDAY THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018

Ms. Jaslin Gargi,

Fiance of Vivin Rathna,

No.201, 5th Cross Street,

Heritage Jeyendra Nagar,

Sembakkam,

Chennai – 600 077.                                                      .. Complainant.

                                                          ..Versus..

     

1. M/s. POWER SUPER BIKES,

Rep. by its Business Head

Mr. Subramanian. C.I.,

No.315/2, Old No.235/2, Annai Salai,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 006.

 

2. M/s. DSK MOTO WHEELS PVT. LTD.,

Rep. by its Managing Director,

Gandharva Heights, 1st Floor,

S.No.1693-1 B/C, Bhamburda,

Shivaji Nagar,

Pune – 411 005.                                                    .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                 : M/s. K. Ramkumar &

                                                                 another

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2 : M/s. Suchit Anant Palande  

                                                                 & another

                                                           

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to pay a sum of Rs.3,02,000/- towards cost of the complaint said bike together with interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the date of claim to till the date of realization and to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards compensation for negligence, deficiency in service, mental agony, hardships pain and frustration with cost to the complainant.

Proof Affidavit of the complainant is not filed for a long time to prove the averments in the complaint.  The complainant and Counsel also called absent for a long time.  Hence, this complaint is dismissed for default.

 

 

MEMBER –I                                                                       PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.