Kerala

Trissur

CC/09/204

P.T.Devassy - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Muringathery Finance & Investments - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.A.D.Benny

23 Sep 2009

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Ayyanthole , Thrissur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/204

P.T.Devassy
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

M/s.Muringathery Finance & Investments
M.F.Davis
M.F.Vincent
M.F.Kuriyan
M.F.Tony
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Padmini Sudheesh 2. Rajani P.S. 3. Sasidharan M.S

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. P.T.Devassy

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. M/s.Muringathery Finance & Investments 2. M.F.Davis 3. M.F.Vincent 4. M.F.Kuriyan 5. M.F.Tony

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Adv.A.D.Benny

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President
 
            The complaint is filed to get back the amount deposited in the respondent firm. The case is as follows :
The complainant has deposited Rs.50,000/- on 16/12/2000 vide receipt No.1037/206/--. It was agreed to pay interest at the rate of 16.5% on deposit amount. The respondents had paid interest till 30/6/2007 and no payment after that   even though the complainant requested the deposited amount with interest. A lawyer notice has issued on 16/12/2000. But the notice returned as unclaimed. Hence the complaint filed.
 
            2. The respondents called absent and set exparte.
 
            3. The complainant has filed affidavit and produced documents to prove his case and they are marked as Exhibits P1 to P3.
 
            4. The complainant’s case is that he has deposited Rs.50,000/- in the respondents firm on 16/12/2000 vide receipt No.1037/206/00. It was agreed to pay interest @ 16.5%. The respondents have paid interest till 30/6/07. But the deposited amount has not refunded. According to the complainant he is entitled to get Rs.50,000/- and interest @ 16.5% from 1/7/2007. 
 
           5. There is no evidence to the contrary.
 
            6. In the result complaint is allowed and the respondents are directed to pay the amount stated in Exhibit P3 receipt with interest at the rate of 16.5% from 1/7/07 till realization and Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) as cost within one month.
 
            Dictated to the Confdl. Asst., transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced

in the open Forum this the 10th day of September 2009. 




......................Padmini Sudheesh
......................Rajani P.S.
......................Sasidharan M.S