Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/253/2015

Y.Ravishankar, S/o.G.Yayathi - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Marg Properties Ltd, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, and anr - Opp.Party(s)

R. Ramana

05 Mar 2019

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/253/2015
( Date of Filing : 05 Nov 2015 )
 
1. Y.Ravishankar, S/o.G.Yayathi
New No.6, Old No.9, 1st Street, Balaji Nagar, Anakaputhur, Chennai-600070
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s.Marg Properties Ltd, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, and anr
Marg Axis 4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kottivakkam, Chennai-600041
2. The Managing Director, M/s. MARG Properties Ltd,
4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kottivakkam, Chennai-600041
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 05 Mar 2019
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

   BEFORE   Hon’ble Dr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN                  PRESIDENT

                      Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER 

 

CC.No. 253/2015

                                                                       DATED THE 5TH  DAY OF MARCH 2019

Y.Ravishankar,

S/o G.Yayathi,

New No.6, old NO.9, 1st street,

Balaji Nagar,

Anakaputhur, Chennai 600 070                        ..complainant

                                               Vs

1.M/s Marg Properties Ltd,

Marg Axis, rep.by its Managing Director,

4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai

Kottivakkam,

Chennai 600 041     

 

2. The Managing Director,

M/s Marg Properties Ltd,

Marg Axis,

4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai

Kottivakkam,

Chennai 600 041                                            ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for complainant            : M/s R.Ramana

Counsel for opposite parties       : M/s B.R.Shankaralingam

 

          This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                                      Docket order   

 

          Complainant present. Memo filed by the counsel for complainant stating that he may be permitted to withdraw the complaint. Memo recorded.

          In view of the above, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cost.

 Sd/-xxxx                                                                   Sd/-xxxx

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                 S.TAMILVANAN

  MEMBER                                                             PRESIDENT

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.