Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/251/2015

Swami Nadhan Nair, S/o.Gopala Krishnan Nair - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Marg Properties Ltd, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, and anr - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Ralph V.Manohar

05 Mar 2019

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/251/2015
( Date of Filing : 05 Nov 2015 )
 
1. Swami Nadhan Nair, S/o.Gopala Krishnan Nair
No.B812, Pushpadurma Apartments, Kalavakkam, Thiruporur-603110, Kanchipuram District
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s.Marg Properties Ltd, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, and anr
4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kottivakkam, Chennai-600041.
2. The Managing Director, M/s. MARG Properties Ltd,
Marg Axis, 4/318, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kottivakkam, Chennai-600041
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 05 Mar 2019
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

   BEFORE    Hon’ble Dr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN                  PRESIDENT

                     Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER 

 

CC.No. 251/2015

                                                                 DATED THE 5TH  DAY OF MARCH 2019

Swami Nadhan Nair,

S/o Gopala Krishnan Nair,

No.B812, Pushpadruma Apartments

Kalavakkam, Thiruporur 603 110

Kanchipuram District                                        ..complainant 

                                     Vs

1. M/s Marg properties Ltd,

Marg Axis, rep.by its Managing Director

4/318, Rajiv Gandhi salai,

Kottivakkam, Chennai  600 041                     

 

2. The Managing Director

M/s Marg properties Ltd,

Marg Axis,

4/318, Rajiv Gandhi salai,

Kottivakkam, Chennai  600 041                         ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for complainant                  : M/s R.Ramana

Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2 : M/s B.R.Sankaralingam

 

          This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                            

                                                                    Docket order

 

          Complainant present. Memo filed by the counsel for complainant stating that he may be permitted to withdraw complaint. Memo recorded.

 

          In view of the above, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cost.

 

Sd/-xxxx                                                                 Sd/-xxxx

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                 S.TAMILVANAN

  MEMBER                                                               PRESIDENT

 

                   

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. TAMILVANAN]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.