BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD
F.A.No.333 OF 2011
Between:
1. The Branch Manager
Shriram Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Dr.No.20/451, Nakathe Bldg., 1st Adoni-301, Kurnool District
2. The Assistant General Manager,
Shriram Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,
D.No.3-6-378, 3rd Liberty Road, Himayathnagar, Hyd-029
Smt R.Nirmala W/o Sri R.Gundu Rao
H.No.11-543, Brahmin Street,
Respondents/complainant
Counsel for the Appellant
Counsel for the Respondent
QUORUM:
SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER
TUESDAY THE THIRTIETH
Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)
1. `2,50,000/- and the premium is single premium for Rs.50,000/-.The respondent’s son
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. `2,50,000/-. The respondent’s son died on 12.10.2009. The respondent’s claim was closed and it was intimated to the respondent through
10.
11.
12. appellant -insurance company has shown by cogent evidence that the respondent’s son suppressed his illness and hospitalization as also the insurance company
13. Satwant Kaur Sandhu Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited” [(2009) 8 SCC 316],. In that case it was held that 14. When the material particulars disclosed by the assured were found to be suppressed, the insurance companies are within their right to repudiate the claims. The findings recorded by the District Forum in regard to the decision of the appellant insurance company in repudiating the claim of the respondent are set aside.
15.
KMK*
