Telangana

StateCommission

CC/59/2011

Smt.Nisha Gupta, W/o.Sri Sunil K.Gupta,R/o.13,Bhavya's Alluri Meadows, - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Lodha Healthy construction and Developers Private Limited, Shah and Nahar Industrial Estate,Dr. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.Pavan Kumar Agarwal, Flat No.402, Plot No.38, Plasant Park Apartments,

08 Mar 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/59/2011
 
1. Smt.Nisha Gupta, W/o.Sri Sunil K.Gupta,R/o.13,Bhavya's Alluri Meadows,
Hyderabad,
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s.Lodha Healthy construction and Developers Private Limited, Shah and Nahar Industrial Estate,Dr.E.Moses Road, Worli
Mumbai, Rep.by.its.Director, mr.Surender Shah, S/o.Sri Kantilal Shah
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION 

C.C.No.59 OF 2011

 

 

Between:

 

Smt R/o 13,

                                 AND

M/s Developers Private Limited, Regd.Off:216
Shah and                                                                                  

Counsel for the complainant         Counsel for the opposite parties     

QUORUM:        

                                             SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

FRIDAY THE EIGTH DAY OF MARCH

                       

 

                                                   

1.    `59`2,00,0000/- towards compensation.

2.            th `2,21,02,639/-. At the time, the representatives of the opposite party company informed the complainant that she need not pay registration charges and other charges and the construction of the apartment would be completed within 18 months from the date of agreement. The complainant paid a total earnest money`59,91,410/- through

3.             

4.            `51,94,910/- with interest @ 18% p.a. and the opposite party kept on issuing demand notices to the complainant. The opposite party has been indulging in unfair trade practice and it is liable to pay compensation under default clause of the agreement to the complainant.

5.            `2,34,24,075/-. The complainant paid an amount of`4`55,45,410/- up till 15th 

6.    

7.    `22,10,263/- being the 10% of the consideration value and issued cheque for the balance amount of`37,81,14/-.

8.    

9.            

10.           

i)            Whether the opposite parties committed deficiency in service in providing the amenities to the building?

ii)          To what relief?

 

11.             `2,34,24,075/-. The complainant paid an amount of`4,50,000/- through cheque at the time of submitting application form and she paid various amounts due and payable,`55,45,410/- up till 15th

12.   

13.           `4`4`4`4

14.           

“6.0. Schedule of Payments: The Applicant/s shall be required to make payments in accordance with the Schedule of Payments stated in the said Allotment Letter and/or the said Agreement (when executed). 

 

15.           

16.           

17.           

9.0 Cancellation:   

 

18.   

On the purchaser committing default in payment on due date of any amount due and payable by the Purchaser/s to the Builder/Promoter under this Agreement (including his/her proportionate share of taxes levied by concerned local authority and other outgoings) and/or on the Purchaser committing breach of any of the terms and conditions herein contained, the Builder/Promoter shall be entitled at its option to terminate this agreement and in such event the Purchaser shall have no right of any nature whatsoever either against and/or in respect of the said Residential Apartment or against the Builder/Promoter.  th 19.           `37,81,147/-. The complainant refused to receive the amount and claimed for refund of the entire amount without assigning any reason. The opposite party has filed copy of cheque dated 31.08.2012.

20.           `50,000/- towards compensation to the complainant.

21.           `37`50,000/- towards compensation together with costs of`5,000/-.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    కె.ఎం.కె.*

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

 

For Complainant 

NIL  EXHIBITS MARKED

For complainant

Ex.A1               

Ex.A2               

Ex.A3               

Ex.A4               

 

For opposite party

Ex.B1               

Ex.B2       

Ex.B3       

byEx.B4       

byEx.B5       

byEx.B6       

byEx.B7       

byEx.B8       

byEx.B9.      

byEx.B10      

Ex.B11      

 

 

 

        

       

       

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.