DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                  .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR. B.A.,B.L.,                                                             …..MEMBER-I
                 THIRU P.MURUGAN, M.Com., ICWA(Inter)., B.L.,                                 ….. MEMBER-II

CC. No.139/2022
THIS TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

Mrs.Jayalakshmi,
W/o.Mr.Chandrasekar,
No.34/16, Vivekananda Street,
Thirumoolar Colony,
Anna Nagar West, Chennai -600 040.                                                                     ....Complainant.
                                                                                       //Vs//
1.M/s.Jayam Electronics & Furniture,
   Rep. by its Authorized Signatory,
   No.363, Konnur High Road,
   Ayanavaram, Chennai - 600 023.

2.M/s.IFB Industries Limited,
   Rep. by its Authorized Signatory,
   No.16, Vishveswariah Industrial Estate,
   1st Main Road, Off White filed Road,
   Mahadevpura , Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 048.

3.M/s.IFB Industries Limited, 
   Home Appliances Division,
   Rep by its Authorized Signatory,
   No1/1, Kanniamman Nagar Main Road,
   Vanagaram, Chennai -600 095.                                                                         ....Opposite parties
 
ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr. S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service against the opposite parties in selling defective washing machine along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to replace the defective goods or to refund a sum of rs.31,500/- the cost of the product and to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant along with cost of the proceedings to the complainant.
No representation for the complainant.  Notice of transfer served on the complainant.  Inspite of sufficient opportunities and information provided by this commission, no proof affidavit was filed.   Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 22nd November 2022. 

  Sd/-                                                   Sd/-                                                          Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                  MEMBER-I                                             PRESIDENT