NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/342/2019

M/S. MEDICAL ELEBORATE CONCEPT PRIVATE LIMITED - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S.FORD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. DEVANSHU AGGARWAL

17 Aug 2022

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 342 OF 2019
 
(Against the Order dated 30/11/2018 in Complaint No. 536/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. M/S. MEDICAL ELEBORATE CONCEPT PRIVATE LIMITED
THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/CEO SHRI ANIL KUMAR GUPTA S/O. LATE SHRI N.K. GUPTA , RESIDNET OF HOUSE NO 44, 2 FLOOR, SARASWATI VIHAR
JALANDHAR 144008
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. M/S.FORD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 ORS.
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANURAG MEHROTRA, S.P. KOIL POST, CHENGALPATTU ,
KANCHEEPURAM
TAMIL NADU 603 204
2. M/S. A.B. MOTORS PVT LTD
(BAGAT FOR) THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, RAJ NARESH SINGH, PLOT NO 53, INDUSTIRAL AREA, PHASE-II,
CHANDIGARH
3. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER, BRANCH OFFICE AT IBB, LINES
JALANDHAR
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. DINESH SINGH,PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Divanshu Aggarwal, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For the Respondent No. 1 : NEMO
For the Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Narender S. Yadav, Advocate
For the Respondent No. 3 : NEMO

Dated : 17 Aug 2022
ORDER

1.       This appeal has been filed under section 19 of the Act 1986 in challenge to the Order dated 30.11.2018 of the State Commission in complaint no. 536 of 2018.

2.       The learned counsel for the appellant (the complainant) submits that appeal no. 169 of 2019 which had been filed by the manufacturer (the respondent no. 1 herein) has been dismissed in default for lack of prosecution today by the bench. In the wake of this development the complainant does not wish to pursue his instant cross-appeal no. 342 of 2019. The submission is that liberty may be provided to the complainant to revive his appeal no. 342 of 2019 in the contingency that the appeal no. 169 of 2019 filed by the manufacturer is restored or revived in the future for whatever reason.

We find this to be a fair submission.

3.       The instant appeal no. 342 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn with  unfettered unconditional liberty to the appellant complainant to revive his appeal in the contingency of restoration or revival of appeal no. 169 of 2019 by filing appropriate application within 30 days of receipt of information of the same.    

4.       The Registry is requested to send a copy each of this Order to the parties in the appeal and to their learned counsel. The stenographer is also requested to upload this Order on the website of this Commission immediately.                           

 
......................
DINESH SINGH
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................J
KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.