Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/120/2018

Mrs.Padmapriya Mani and another, Chennai-600 041. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Evita Construction Pvt Ltd, Rep by its Managing Director, and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.V.Gowri

01 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                              PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

  C.C. No.120/2018

                                                                         DATED THE 1^ST  DAY OF NOVEMBER  2021

 

1. Mrs. Padmapriya Mani

2. Mr. Mani Ganapathi Ramachandran

both residing at

206, Deccan Enclave,72, T.M Maistry Street,

Vannanthurai, Chennai – 600 041.                                                                            .. Complainant.

-Versus-

1. M/s. Evita Constructions Private Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director,

Hiranandani Park, Triveni Nagar,

Vadakapattu Village, Singaperumal Koil,

Kancheepuram District – 603 204.

 

2. M/s. Evita Constructions Private Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director,

# 514, Dalamal Towers Nariman Point,

Mumbai – 400 021.

 

3. Hirananadani Palace Gardens Private Ltd.,

Corporate Office,

Rep. by its Managing Director,

Sigma, 6^th Floor, Technology Street,

Hiranandani Business Park

Powai, Mumbai 400 076.                                                                               .. Opposite Party.

 Counsel for the complainants 1 & 2        : M/s. V. Gowri

 Counsel for the opposite party 1 & 2       : M/s. K.B. Gopi

Counsel for the opposite party 3               : M/s. Sharath Chandran

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 1.11.2021 for appearance of both and for arguments this Commission made the following:-

                                                                                                          Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant and OP3. Opposite parties 1 & 2 present.  This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant & OP3 and for taking necessary steps or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the complainant and OP3 were not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.15 pm, then also the parties has not appeared. Hence keeping the complaint pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

 

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                                     Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT