Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/118/2018

Mr.S.B.Shunmugaraj, S/o Mr.S. Balasundram,(Power of Attorney Holder) and 17 others - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Cox & Kings Ltd., Rep by its Manager, and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON(Mr.S.B.Shunmugaraj)

28 Jun 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                            MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.118/2018

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF JUNE 2023

1. Mr. S.B. Shanmugaraj,

S/o. Mr. S. Balasundaram,

(Power of Attorney Holder of the

following 17 complainants),

Janaki Nagar,

Valasaravakkam,

Chennai – 600 087.      

 

2. Ms. Radha Shunmugaraj,

W/o. Mr. S.B. Shunmugaraj,

Valasaravakkam,

Chennai – 600 087.

 

3. Mr. S.B. Palani Durai,

S/o. Mr. S. Balasundaram,

Jawaharlal Nehru,

Koyambedu,

Chennai – 600 107.

 

4. Ms. P. Mallika,

W/o. Mr. S.B. Palani Durai,

Jawaharlal Nehru,

Koyambedu,

Chennai – 600 107.

 

5. Dr. S.B. Jothi Ramalingam,

S/o. Mr. S. Balasundaram,

Vania Street,

Saidapet,

Chennai – 600 015.

 

6. Ms. J. Kalavathi,

W/o. Mr. S.B. Jothi Ramalingam,

Vania Street,

Saidapet,

Chennai – 600 015.

 

7. Mr. M.S. Shanmugam,

S/o. Mr. V. Sambandam,

Sadayappan Street,

Saidapet,

Chennai – 600 015.

 

8. Ms. S. Banumathi,

W/o. Mr. M.S. Shanmugam,

Sadayappan Street,

Saidapet,

Chennai – 600 015.

 

9. Mr. M.S. Vilva Nathan,

S/o. Mr. V. Sambandam,

Tank Square Street,

Saidapet,

Chennai – 600 015.

 

10. Ms. V. Sivakami,

W/o. Mr. V. Sambandam,

Tank Square Street,

Saidapet,

Chennai – 600 015.

 

11. Mr. G. Thanikachalam,

S/o. Mr. M. Ganesan,

Kamaraj Road,

Anankaputhur,

Chennai – 600 070.

 

12. Ms. Hamsadevi,

W/o. Mr. G. Thanikachalam,

Kamaraj Salai,

Anankaputhur,

Chennai – 600 070.

 

13. Mr. K.M. Natarajan,

S/o. Mr. K. Mahalingam,

3^rd Street, Z-Block,

13^th Main Raod,

Anna Nagar,

Chennai – 600 040.

 

14. Ms. N. Vanaja,

W/o. Mr. K.M. Natarajan,

Z-Block, 13^th Main Road,

Anna Navarro,

Chennai – 600 040.

 

15. Dr. Ms. C.B. Tharani,

D/o. Mr. C.S. Balasubramaniam,

Kodambakkam,

Chennai – 600 024.

 

16. Mr. S. Kumaran,

S/o. Mr. C.B. Tharani,

V.O.C. Colony,

Kodambakkam,

Chennai – 600 024.

 

17. Ms. S. Amutha,

W/o. Mr. S. Kumaran,

V.O.C. Colony,

Kodambakkam,

Chennai – 600 024.

 

18. Mr. A. Rishi (Minor),

Represented by his Father and Natural Guardian,

Mr. S. Kumaran,

V.O.C. Colony,

Kodambakkam,

Chennai – 600 024.                                                                                  .. Complainants.                                                   

- Versus –

1. M/s. Cox & Kings Ltd.,

Represented by its Manager,

No.3, Arcot Road,

Valasarawalkam,

Chennai – 600 087.  

 

2. M/s. Cox & Kings Ltd.,

Represented by its Manager,

No.10, Karuna Corner,

Spurtank Road,

Chetpet,

Chennai – 600 031.

 

3. M/s. Cox & Kings Ltd.,

Represented by its Manager,

No.16, Bank Street,

Fort,

Mumbai - 1                                                                              .. Opposite parties.

 

Complainants                                              : Party in person

Counsel for the  Opposite parties 1 to 3    : M/s. V. Chandrakanth

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 28.06.2023 for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of opposite parties 1 to 3 and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of Opposite parties 1 to 3 and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M., still, there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No costs.

 

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                       PRESIDENT