Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/120/2017

T.Valsala - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Chandra Hyundai., Rep by its manger & other - Opp.Party(s)

A.Mohamed Ismail-Complt

27 Feb 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                      BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                          Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 CC.No. 120/2017

 

                                                           DATED THIS THE 27^th  DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

T.Valsala,

W/o Late K.N.Balakrishnan,

Plot No.10, Pilayar Koil street,

Durga Nagar, Tambaram Sanatorium,

Chennai 600 047                                                       ..Complainant

 

                                                    Vs

 

1. M/s Chandra Hyundai,

Rep.by its Manager (Service),

651,Avinashi Road,

P.N.Palayam, Coimbatore 641 037

 

2. M/s Hyundai Motor India Limited,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

Add:2^nd, 5^th  & 6^th Floor, Corporate one

(Baani Building) plot No.5,

Commercial centre, Jasola,

New Delhi – 110 025                                               ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainant                               : M/s A Mohammed Ismail

Counsel for the 1^st opposite party                        : M/s R.Bharath kumar

Counsel for the 2^nd opposite party                        : M/s M.B.Gopalan

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                                       Docket order

 

          No representation for complainant and 2^nd opposite party. 1^st opposite party present. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

 

   Sd/-                                                                                                            Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                      R.SUBBIAH                  

      MEMBER                                                                                             PRESIDENT