Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/423/2014

M/s. Saroj Kumar Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.CCIL Team, Contry Club India - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

31 Aug 2017

ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   05.08.2014

                                                                        Date of Order :   31.08.2017

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT            

                  TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

             DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.423/2014

TUESDAY THIS 31^st  DAY OF AUGUST 2017

Saroj Kumar Singh,

Room No.329, New CPWD Quarters

Transit Hostel,

Besant Nagar 600 090.                             .. Complainant

                                        ..Vs..

 

1.  CCIL Team, Country Club India,

No.4/22, 2^nd Floor, Ramakrishna Street,

North Usman Road,

Opp. Joyalukkus, T.Nagar,

Chennai 600 017.

 

2. The Country Vacations,

Regional Manager,

No.6/11, Sree Vallabha Tower,

1^st Floor, Park Circle College Road,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai 600 006.

 

3. The General Manager,

6-3-1219/a, 2^nd Floor,

Country Club Kool,

Begumpet,

Hyderabad 500 016.

 

4. The Country Club (l) Ltd.,

Amrutha Castle,

5-9-16, Saifabad,

Opp. Secretarait,

Hyderabad 500 063.                                 .. Opposite parties.

 

For Complainant                     :    Party in person

For opposite parties 1 & 3        :    Exparte.

For opposite parties 2 & 4        :    Dismissed.

  

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

          This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking direction to refund the sum of Rs.12,000/- for deficiency in service with interest.

        Proof affidavit of complainant not filed for long time.  The complainant also absent for long time.  Hence it is treated that the complainant  have no proof affidavit and the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

          .

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.