Date of filing:      26.03.2019
                                                                                                                   Date of disposal: 21.11.2022

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                  .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.P.MURUGAN,M.Com.ICWA(Inter),B.L.,                                       ....MEMBER-II

RBT/CC. No.75/2022
THIS MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022
(CC.No.64/2019 sent from DCDRC, Chennai North)

Mr.SK.Ameerjan, 
Flat No.C, Door No.31/32,
Marakayar (Labbai) Street,
Chennai 600 001.                                                                                 ……Complainant.     
                                                                          //Vs//
1.M/s.Bharti AXA,
    Rep. by its Managing Directior,
    Spectrum Tower, 3rd Floor,
    Rajanpada, Mindspace,
    Malad West, Maharashtra -400 004.

2.M/s.Integrated Insurance Broking Service Private Limited,
    Rep. by its Managing Director,
    No.111, New No.227, Thambu Chetty Street,
    Chennai 600 001.

3.State Bank of India,
    Rep. by its Branch Manager,
    Broadway Branch, Chennai 600 001.                                   .......Opposite parties. 
                         
This complaint has been filed before DCDRC, Chennai (North) as CC.No.64/2019 and transferred to this commission by the order of the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai and taken on file as CC.No.75/2022.             
  The complaint was filed by the complainant under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.29,000/- representing the entire amount paid by the complainant together with penalty and to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant and to pay a sum of Rs.4,70,000/- towards cost of the complaint to the complainant.  
No representation for complainant inspite of service of notice on 18.05.2022.  Written arguments not filed by the complainant. Sufficient opportunities given for filing written arguments  and for appearance on 08.08.2022, 23.08.2022, 13.09.2022, 19.09.2022, 06.10.2022, 19.10.2022, 31.10.2022, 08.11.2022  and on 21.11.2022. In spite of the same, complainant failed to appear and prosecute the case. Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 21st November 2022. 

  Sd/-                                                                                                                 Sd/-
MEMBER-II                                                                                                  PRESIDENT