Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/11/2016

Dr.S.Mahalingam - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Bajaj Finance Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

12 Nov 2018

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 23.11.2015                                                                          Date of Order  : 12.11.2018

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K. AMALA, M.A., L.L.B.                           :  MEMBER-I

   

C.C. No.11/2016

DATED THIS MONDAY THE 12^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018

Dr. S. Mahalingam,

S/o. (Late) K. Sannasi,

No.1, Bakthavachalam Street,

Koyambedu,

Chennai – 600 107.                                                      .. Complainant.

                                                          ..Versus..

     

1. The Manager – Recovery,

Bajaj Finance Limited,

No.805, Raheja Towers 8^th Floor,

Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 002.

 

2. Mr. K. Kannan,

Legal Advisor,

Bajaj Finance Limited,

No.805, Raheja Towers 8^th Floor,

Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 002.                                                 .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant           :  Party in person

Counsel for the 1^st opposite party  :  M/s. J. Ranjani Devi

Counsel for the 2^nd opposite party :  Exparte

                                                           

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to refund a sum of Rs.14,124/- being miscalculated amount along with interest at the rate of Rs.2/- per hundred per month for 5 months from July 2015 to November 2015 and to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation for perjury, unlawful activities like impersonation, threatening through group of Advocates etc and to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- towards compensation for blackmailing, threatening of dire consequences like ruining daughter’s career, false account of EMI paid, false allegation of arrest and non-bailable warrant etc with cost of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant.

The complainant died long back.  No legal heirs impleaded also.   As per 2001 (1) CPR 45 National Commission, cause of action fails.    Hence, this complaint is dismissed as abated.

 

 

MEMBER –I                                                                       PRESIDENT