Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

246/2014

M/s.KG Foundations(p) Ltd., Rep by its Director Kishor Kumar Gokuldas, - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co.td., Rep by its Manager, - Opp.Party(s)

P.Vasudevan

06 Sep 2016

ORDER

 

 

                                                                            Complaint presented on:  16.12.2014

                                                                                Order pronounced on:  28.09.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

WEDNESDAY THE 28^th    DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016

 

                                       C.C.NO.246/2014

 

 

1.M/s.KG Foundations (p) Ltd,

Represented by its Director Kishor Kumar Gokaldas,

No.5, Bishop Wallers Avenue (East),

Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

 

2.Mr.A.Jagadeesan,

S/o.G.Arumugam,

25, East Namachivayapuram,

Choolaimedu,

Chennai – 600 094.

 

                                                                                     ..... Complainants

 

                                     ..Vs..

M/s. Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Rep. by its Manager,

New No.4, Old No.319, 3^rd Floor,

Valluvarkottam High Road,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai – 600 034.

 

                                                                  …..Opposite party

 

 

Date of complaint                                            : 26.12.2014

Counsel for complainant                       : M/s.Dr.P.Vasudevan (63/82)

 

Counsel for Opposite Party                    : Mrs. Elveera Ravindran

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

No representation for Complainant. Counsel for Opposite Party present. The Complainant has not filed proof affidavit till 12.45 p.m today inspite of posted today as last chance. Even prior to today’s hearing, to file proof affidavit 15 hearings chances were given. Inspite of sufficient opportunity given to the Complainant to file his proof affidavit, he has not chosen to file the same establishes that the Complainant has no interest in prosecuting the Complaint. Hence the Complaint is dismissed for default for non filing of proof affidavit. No costs.

Pronounced by us on this 28^th  day of September 2016.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – II                                                              PRESIDENT