NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/74/2013

M/S. REKSON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. VIPUL LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. RAGHUNANDAN SHARMA & SYED AQIB ALI

14 Aug 2017

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 673 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 08/12/2011 in Complaint No. 10/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. M/S. ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR/AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, SH. AJAY GOEL, 28, COMMUNITY CENTRE, SAKET,
NEW DELHI-110017
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. REKSON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & 4 ORS.
C/O 19, EASTERN AVENUE, MAHARANI BAGH,
NEW DELHI-110065
2. RABINDER NATH REKHI
DIRECTOR, M/S. REKSON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. C/O. 19, EASTERN AVENUE, MAHARANI BAGH,
NEW DELHI-110065
3. MRS. RENUKA REKHI,
DIRECTOR, M/S. REKSON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. C/O. 19, EASTERN AVENUE, MAHARANI BAGH,
NEW DLEHI-110065
4. M/S. VIPUL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LTD
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN, 16/2, LORD SINHA ROAD,
KOLKATA-700071
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 17/12/2012 in Complaint No. 9/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. M/S. REKSON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS.
THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, 19, EASTERN AVENUE, MAHARANI BAGH,
NEW DLEHI-1100065
2. SH. ROBINDRA NATH REKHI, DIRECTOR
M/S. REKSON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., 19, EASTERN AVENUE, MAHARANI BAGH,
NEW DELHI-110065
3. MRS. RENUKA REKHI
M/S. REKSON PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., 19, EASTERN AVENUE, MAHARANI BAGH,
NEW DELHI-110065
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. VIPUL LTD.
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN, VIPUL TECH SQUARE, GOLF COURSE ROAD, SECTOR-43,GURGAON/SURUGRAM-122022
2. M/S. ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,
THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR/AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. AJAY GOEL , 28, COMMUNITY CENTRE, SAKET,
NEW DELHI-110017
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT

For the Appellant :
For M/s Orchid Infrastructure : Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate
Ms. Jigyasa Sharma, Advocate
For M/s Rekson Properties : Mr. R.N. Rekhi & Mrs. Renuka Rekhi,
Directors of M/s Rekson Properties
For M/s Vipul Ltd. : Mr. Gaurav Duggal, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For M/s Orchid Infrastructure : Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate
Ms. Jigyasa Sharma, Advocate
For M/s Rekson Properties : Mr. R.N. Rekhi & Mrs. Renuka Rekhi,
Directors of M/s Rekson Properties
For M/s Vipul Ltd. : Mr. Gaurav Duggal, Advocate

Dated : 14 Aug 2017
ORDER

I am happy to note that during the pendency of these two cross Appeals, the contesting parties, with the active intervention of their respective lawyers, have arrived at an out-of-Court amicable settlement, on the following terms:

“Settlement Agreement

 

Parties in the present two appeals, have on their own accord, amicably settled their disputes.  The terms of the settlement as agreed to between the parties are:

 

  1. M/s Orchid Infrastructures shall pay a sum of Rs 1,40,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Forty Lakhs only) to M/s Rekson Properties, towards full and final settlement of all the claims of M/s Rekson Properties.

  2. M/s Orchid Infrastructures shall pay the settlement amount by way of post-dated cheques in the following manner:

  3. Rs.35,00,000/- on 14.08.2017

  4. Rs.35,00,000/- on 01.09.2017

  5. Rs.35,00,000/- on 01.10.2017

  6. Rs.35,00,000/- on 01.11.2017

     

  7. M/s Rekson Properties and Mrs. and Mr. Rekhi shall have no claim, title, lien or interest in the two commercial units being unit no.419 and unit no. 420, admeasuring 1029 sq. ft. each in Orchid Centre, Gurugram.

     

  8. M/s Rekson Properties shall handover all original documents, including the space buyer’s agreement and all other communications with regard to the units, to M/s Orchid Infrastructures.

 

  1. Both the parties shall withdraw their individual appeals being FA/74/2013 and FA/673/2012.”

     

    In partial modification to the afore-noted terms of settlement, it is agreed between the parties that all the original documents in the possession of the Complainants shall be delivered to M/s Orchid Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., on receipt of the fourth last instalment.

    The first instalment, totalling ₹35,00,000/-, has been paid to the Complainants by means of cheques no. 000339 and 000340, both dated 14.08.2017.  Learned Counsel appearing for M/s Orchid Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. states that all the post-dated cheques shall be honoured on presentation for payment.

    In view of the said settlement, both the Appeals are dismissed as not pressed, with no order as to costs.

    It is made clear that if anyone of the parties fails to comply with the terms of the afore-noted settlement, it will be open to the other party to have the present Appeals revived.      

    It will be open to the parties to withdraw the amounts deposited by them at the time of filing the Appeals or pursuant to any interim order passed in these Appeals.

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.