Karnataka

Raichur

DCFR 24/07

Gururaj Shellagi S/o. Dattarayya - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. VINIV-INC-(Venus-v)Bangalore - Opp.Party(s)

Chandramaouli

18 May 2007

ORDER


DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,DC Office Compound, Sath Kacheri
consumer case(CC) No. DCFR 24/07

Gururaj Shellagi S/o. Dattarayya
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

M/s. VINIV-INC-(Venus-v) Raichur
M/s. VINIV-INC-(Venus-v)Bangalore
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Perused complaint and documents. Complainant and his counsel not present. Perused O/sheet sufficient time granted for hearing on admission of complaint right from 10-04-07. No valid grounds. Hence submission of proxy counsel for adjournment is not valid. Hence complaint deserve to be and same is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. File be closed.