Delhi

New Delhi

CC/1002/2012

Mridula Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. Vian Infrastructure Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

02 Jul 2016

ORDER

 

 

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI

(DISTT. NEW DELHI),

 ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,

 NEW DELHI-110001

 

Case No.C.C./1002/2012                                                                                                                   Dated:

In the matter of:

SMT. MIRIDULA KUMAR

W/o Sh. Nagender Kumar,

R/o H.No.19/134, Peer Kalyani,

Moti Lal Nehru Road,

Agra-282004 (U.P.)

        ……..COMPLAINANT

VERSUS

1.     M/S. VIAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

        14th Floor, Vijaya Building,

        Barakhamba Road,

        New Delhi-110001

 

2.     MR. SURYA THAPAR

        Chairman & Director,

        M/s. Vian Infrastructure Ltd.,

        14th Floor, Vijaya Building,

        Barakhamba Road,

        New Delhi-110001

               .... OPPOSITE PARTIES

 

MEMBER: NIPUR  CHANDNA

ORDER

Complainant booked one plot admeasuring approx 200 sq. yards in Agra Shamshabad Road, VIII, Mouja Nagla Kali, Agra U.P. with the OPs and paid booking amount of Rs. 73,400/- vide cheque dated 10/03/07 which was duly acknowledged by the OPs vide receipt No. AG-10934 dated 19/3/07.

        It is stated by the complainant that Plot Buyers Agreement dated 26/12/07 was executed between him and the OPs.

        It is alleged by the complainant that she had paid second installment to the OPs for a sum of Rs. 1,46,800/-  vide cheque dated 5/05/07 which was duly acknowledged by the OPs vide receipt No. AG-10934. The complainant also paid 3rd installment to the OPs for a sum of Rs. 1,46,800/- duly acknowledged by the OPs vide receipt No. AG-10934 dated 26/7/07.

        It is further alleged by the complainant that she paid 42 installments of Rs. 6116/- each to the OPs by way of cheques and the same was duly acknowledged by the OPs.

        It is alleged by the complainant that as per the agreement he made all the payment to the OPs.  It is further alleged by the complainant that she visited at the site and found that there was no plot on the site, she also visited the office of the OPs to know the factual position of the existence of the plot in question, but she could not found any representative of the OPs at its office, despite several visit.

        It is alleged by the complainant that she came to know that OPs committed fraud not only upon him but with the other customers also and as such she lodged a complaint with Economic Offences Wing, Mandir Marg, New Delhi on 11/9/12, but no action has been taken against the OPs by EOW. (Economic Offence Wing, Delhi)

        It is alleged by the complainant she paid total sum of Rs. 6,60,572/- to the OPs upto November 2010. But till today OPs have neither refunded the money as per the agreement nor have allotted the possession of the plot.  Hence, this complaint. 

        Notice of the complaint was sent to the OPs through Reg. AD Post for 1/5/13. Dasti Notice was also served to the Ops. Since none appeared on behalf of OPs, they were ordered to be proceeded with ex-parte.

Complainant has filed his evidence by way of affidavit, wherein he has corroborated the contents of the complaint.

        We have heard arguments ex-parte advanced at bar and have persued the record.

        Ld. Counsel for the complainant has placed on record, the copy of Land/Plot Buyers & Seller Agreement, copies of the receipt issued by the OPs against the payment received by them, and the copy of written complaint filed before Economic Offence Wing, Delhi dated 11/9/12 in support of his case.

From the un-rebutted testimony of the complainant and the documents placed on record, we are convinced that the story put forth by the complainant is true.  Bare perusal of the documents attached with the complaint make it clear that the complainant had deposited the amount as per the agreement dated 11/2/08 with the OPs well in time and it is the OPs who had failed  perform its part of contract.

By not giving possession of the promised plot and not providing the refund of the amount deposited by the complainant as per Plot Buyers Agreement dated 11/2/08, Ops are liable for deficiency in service.

We therefore hold OPs guilty of deficiency in service and direct it as under:-

  1.  Pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 6,60,572/- along with simple interest @12% p.a. from the date of filing of complaint till payment, and
  2.  Pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 75,000/- for mental agony suffered by him.
  3.  Pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 10,000/- as cost of litigation.

The order shall be complied by the OPs within 30 days of the receipt of the copy of the order. If the said amount is not paid by the OPs within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the same shall be recovered by the complainant along with simple interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of this order till recovery of the said amount of Rs. 85,000/–. This final order be sent to server (www.confonet.nic.in ). A copy each of this order each be sent to both parties free of cost by post.

 

Pronounced in open Forum on ........................

 

 

 

(S K SARVARIA)

 PRESIDENT

 

 

 

                                                    (H M VYAS)                                     (NIPUR CHANDNA)

                                                         MEMBER                                                  MEMBER

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.