Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/106/2010

Rajinder Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ms. Veena Gautam - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Kamal K.Sharma

11 May 2011

ORDER


The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019
FIRST APPEAL NO. 106 of 2010
1. Rajinder KumarS/o Sh. Chandan Ram, R/o # 1064, Phase X, Mohali2. Satish KumarS/o Sh. Daulat Ram, R/o # 4137, Sector 68, Mohali3. A.S.AroraS/o Sh. Amar Singh R/o # 57/8, Rajpura Road, Dehradun ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Ms. Veena Gautam D/o Late Sh. Charan Dass Gautam R/o # 3049, Sector 35-D, chandigarh2. Chairman, NABARDBandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai3. A.Ramanathan, Chief General Manager,Head Office NABARD, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai4. Sh. Surinder Singh, ClerkThe NABARD Bank, Plot No. 3, Sector 34-A, Opp. Piccadilly Theatre, Chandigarh5. The NABARD Employees Urban Salary Earners Thrifts and Credit Society Ltd.O/o the NABARD Bank, Plot No. 3, sector 34-A, Opp. Piccadilly Theatre, Chandigarh through its President ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Sh. Kamal K.Sharma, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 21 Apr 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.




STATE COMMISSION

 

FA NO.106     OF   2010

 

PRESENT : None for the appellant.

                   Mrs. Madhu P. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.

 

Dated the 21ST day of April, 2010.

 

                                                ORDER

 

                     This case has been taken twice but none has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It is already 11:40 A.M. It seems that the appellant is not interesting in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

 

 

 

Sd/-

(MAJ GEN S. P. KAPOOR (RETD.))

MEMBER

 

 

 

Sd/-

[JUSTICE PRITAM PAL]

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

Sd/-

     (NEENA SANDHU)

MEMBER

 

Ad/-


MAJ GEN S.P.KAPOOR (RETD.), MEMBERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL, PRESIDENT MRS. NEENA SANDHU, MEMBER