Kerala

Palakkad

CC/157/2017

Dr. Muhammad Shereef - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

K. Dhananjayan

04 Mar 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/157/2017
( Date of Filing : 06 Nov 2017 )
 
1. Dr. Muhammad Shereef
S/o. P.P Veerankutty, Puthanpeedikakkal House, Vallampuzha Post, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad Dt. - 679 336, Now employed as Senior resident Doctor, Department of Pediatrics Aarupadi Veedu, Medical colleage Hospital, Kirumampakkam, Puduchery Pondicherry , Pin - 607 403
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt. Ltd.,
The Manager/ Authorised Signatory,The Manufacturers of Toyota Car and other Commercial and Passenger Vehicles like Innova etc. Regd Office 1 Ram Nagar, Ram District, Industrial Area, Bidadi, Karnataka , Pin - 562 128
2. M/s.Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd.,
1 Ram Nagar Ram district, Industrial Area, Bidadi, Karnataka, Pin 562 128, rep by its Managing Director/ Manager/ Authorised Signatory
3. M/s. Lanson Toyota
Villupuram , No. 20 Gingee Road, Villupuram, Pin -605 602
4. M/s. Lanson Toyota Villupuram,
No. 20 Gingee Road Villupuram, Pin 605 602, Rep. by its Managing Director/ Manager/ Authorised Signatory
5. M/s. Amana Toyata VPK Motors Pvt. Ltd.,
N.H 213 Mundur P.O, Poriyani, Palakkad Rep. by its Managing Director/ Manager/ authorised Signatory.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PALAKKAD

Dated this the 04th  day of  March, 2022

 

Present  :  Sri.Vinay Menon V., President        

             :   Smt.Vidya.A., Member

              

       Date of filing: 06/11/2017

 

 

       CC/157/2017

Dr. Muhammad Shereef

S/o P.P.Veerankutty,Puthanpeedikakkal House,

Vallapuzha post,Pattambi Taluk,                       -                Complainant

Palakkad Dt- 679 336  

Presently Employed as Senior Resident Doctor,

Department of Pediatrics, Aarupadi Veedu,

Medical College Hospital,Kirumampakkam

Puducherry(Pondichery) Pin-607 403

                                                Vs

1.M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt Ltd

   Regd Office: 1 Ram Nagar, Ram District,

  Industrial Area,Bidadi,Karnataka, Pin – 562 128

(Rep by its Managing Director/Manager/Authorised Signatory)

2. M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt Ltd,

    Regd Office, 1 Ram Nagar, Ram District,

    Industrial Area,Bidadi,Karnataka,Pin-562 128

    Rep by its Managing Director/

    Manager/Authorised Signatory.

3. M/s Lanson Toyota

    Villupuram, No 20 Gingee Road,                            -   Opposite Parties

    Villupuram, Pin- 605602.

4. M/s Lanson Toyota

    Villupuram, No 20 Gingee Road,

    Villupuram, Pin- 605602.

     Rep by its Managing Director/

    Manager/Authorised Signatory.

5. M/s Amana Toyota VPK Motors Pvt Ltd

    N.H 213,Mundur Post,Poriyani,Palakkad(Dt),

    Kerala.

   Rep by its Managing Director/Manager/Authorised Signatory

 

         

                                         O R D E R

 

 

By Sri.Vinay Menon V., President        

 

  1. Facts of the case are not ventured into. This CC is being taken for orders in view of the consistent disobedience to an order of this Commission shown by the complainant.

 

  1. During the course of the complaint, this Commission had at the behest of the complainant appointed an expert commissioner to ascertain the damages to the vehicle of the complainant. The expert commissioner examined the vehicle twice and filed his report. The two visits were, infact, necessitated due to the absence of the complainant and his counsel even after having notice of the inspection. This Commission had on  19/08/2019 ordered payment of Rs.4500/- (Rupees Four Thousand Five Hundred Only)as batta to the commissioner for his two visits.

 

  1. Instead of effecting payment of batta to the commissioner, the complaint chose to file a Revision petition before  the honourable KSCDRC, details of which were never submitted/disclosed before this Commission. From 19/08/2019 till date order of this Commission remains un - complied  with .

 

  1. On 15/09/2021 this Commission passed an order directing the complainant to file an affidavit   stating the details and present status of the Revision Petition. It was also directed to takes steps in accordance with the order dated 19/08/2019 in the event there was no pending stay orders.

 

  1. On 12/01/2022 also this same order was repeated. It is pertinent to note that on both these occasions the complainant was represented in this Commission. On 24/02/2022 also,  eventhough there was representation for the complainant , they failed to comply either with the direction of 19/08/2019 or that on 15/09/2021.

 

  1. The complainant had been dragging along the proceedings herein as well as refraining from effecting payment of batta to  an expert Commissioner who had carried out inspection of the complainant’s vehicle  at the request of the complainant himself. The batta is not being paid as the commission report did not come up in favour of the complainant. It is inhuman and unfair not to pay an expert commissioner appointed by this Commission for and on behalf of the complainant for a proper and just adjudication of the lis.

 

  1.  Pendency  of a Revision Petition is not a ground for non compliance of an  order of this Commission in the absence of an order of stay. Hence the conduct of the complainant is nothing short of an abuse of the process of law. Such temerity is abhorrent and is to be dealt with accordingly . Had the complainant been a bonafide litigant, he would have complied with the directives of this Commission.
  2.  Hence we dismiss the complaint for wilfull and malicious  non compliance of the order dated 19/08/2019 passed by this Commission.

     

Pronounced in the open court on this the 04 th day of March, 2022

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                                              Vinay Menon V

                                          President.

 

                                                Sd/-

                                                                                             Vidya.A                                                                                                                Member        

                                                       

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.