Delhi

New Delhi

CC/283/2019

sangeeta Arora - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. TDI Infrastructures Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

26 Nov 2019

ORDER

 

 

                           CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI

                             (DISTT. NEW DELHI),

                      ‘M’ BLOCK, 1^STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,

                                               NEW DELHI-110001

 

Case No.CC.283/2019                                 Dated:

In the matter of:

       Mrs. Sangeeta Arora,

        KJ-53, Kavi Nagar,

       Ghaziabad-201002, U.P.

                           ……..COMPLAINANT

 

VERSUS

• M/s TDI Infrastructures  Ltd.

         Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-01.

        Through its Managing Director

 

• M/s TDI Recreation and Amusement Ltd.

         10, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, New Delhi-08.

                                                                                                                                                             …........OPPOSITE PARTY

 

 

​ARUN KUMAR ARYA, PRESIDENT

ORDER

The complainant filed the present complaint against OPs alleging deficiency in services.  Argument on the admissibility of the complaint on the point of  pecuniary jurisdiction heard. It is stated by the counsel for the complainant that although the cost of unit in question exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum, but in the prayer clause the complainant has prayed for the refund of the sum of Rs.50,000/- and Rs,.32,273/- illegally taken by the OP in the name of Club Membership charges and as such the judgment of Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Case no. 97 of 2016, decided by Hon’ble NCDRC on 07/10/2016 reported as Manu/CF/0499/16 is not applicable in his case.

Perusal of the file shows that the complainant at Para-3 stated that the cost of the unit in question is Rs.26,64,907/-. During the course of arguments, it is also  admitted that the cost of unit in question exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum, i.e. Rs. 20 Lacs.

 

Admittedly, the cost of the unit is question is Rs.26,64,907/-, which exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum i.e. Rs. 20 Lacs, as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, in the light of  Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Case no. 97 of 2016, decided by Hon’ble NCDRC on 07/10/2016 reported as Manu/CF/0499/16.

In view of the above discussion, the complaint be returned to the complainant along with annexures/ documents by retaining a copy of the same for records with liberty to file the same before the competent Forum as per the Law. The particulars in the light of the judgement of Hon’ble NCDRC in the matter of Tushar Batra & Anr. Vs. M/S Unitech Limited decided on 26/04/2017, Case no.-299 of 2014 are as follows.

• Date of presentation of complaint :-    14/11/2019.

 

• Date of return of complaint :-              26/11/2019.
• Name of complainant :-                     Sangeeta Arora.

 

Copy of the order be given Dasti to the parties.  File be consigned to  record room.

 

Announced  in open Forum on  26/11/2019. .

 

 

 (ARUN KUMAR ARYA)

                             PRESIDENT

         (NIPUR CHANDNA)                                         (H M VYAS)

                          MEMBER                                                     MEMBER