West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

MA/67/2022

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Shaw - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Swadhinata Properties and 5 others - Opp.Party(s)

02 Aug 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/67/2022
( Date of Filing : 02 Aug 2022 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/366/2019
 
1. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Shaw
S/o Late Bhagirathi Shaw, 7/1/A, Bhairab Mukherjee Lane, P.O. - Shyambazar, P.S. - Ultadanga, Kolkata - 700004.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Swadhinata Properties and 5 others
13C, Srish Chandra Chowdhury Lane, P.S. - Tala, Kolkata - 700002.
2. Subhabrata Biswas
S/o Late Subhas Chandra Biswas, 13C, Srish Chandra Chowdhury Lane, P.S. - Tala, Kolkata - 700002.
3. Sri Sadananda Sadhukhan
S/o Lte Kalipada Sadhukhan, 7A, Rai Charan Sadhukhan Road, P.O. - Shyambazar, P.S. - Ultadanga, Kolkata - 700004.
4. Sri Pabitra Kumar Sadhukhan
S/o Late Kalipada Sadhukhan, 7A, Rai Charan Sadhukhan Road, P.O. - Shyambazar, P.S. - Ultadanga, Kolkata - 700004.
5. Sri Santanu Sadhukhan
S/o Late Kamal Krishna Sadhukhan, 7A, Rai Charan Sadhukhan Road, P.O. - Shyambazar, P.S. - Ultadanga, Kolkata - 700004.
6. Sri Nityananda Sadhukhan
S/o Late Kalipada Sadhukhan, 7A, Rai Charan Sadhukhan Road, P.O. - Shyambazar, P.S. - Ultadanga, Kolkata - 700004.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 02 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Order No.1 contd..         2/8/2022

Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite parties is also present.

Application dated 22/02/2022 filed by the complainant U/S152 C.P.C. read with Section 40 of C.P. Act, 2019 is registered as Misc. Application No. 67/2022

In view of order no.20 of CC/366/2019 the application U/S 152 C.P.C. read with Section 40 of C.P. Act,2019 is taken up for hearing. Copy already served.

No written objection has been filed by the opposite parties.

Perused. Considered. Heard both the sides.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant prays for correction of typographical mistake on the 10th line of the order no.16 of CC/366/2019 dated 17/12/2021. According to the complainant in the 10th line ‘Ld. Advocate for the complainant’ be replaced as Ld. Advocate for the respondent/opposite party.

On perusal of the record I do not find any such sentence in the 10th line of order no.16 dated 17/12/2021 of CC/366/2019.

Therefore, the petition 22/02/2022 U/S 152 C.P.C. read with Section 40  of C.P. Act,2019 stands rejected.

Thus Misc. Application is disposed of.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.