Goa

StateCommission

EA/06/2013

Dr. Mahmud Ali - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Sushma Constructions & others - Opp.Party(s)

Ulhas G. Shetye

16 Dec 2013

ORDER

Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Panaji-Goa
 
Execution Application No. EA/06/2013
In
CC/16/2010
 
1. Dr. Mahmud Ali
53,Teoluz Gardens,behind Cottage Hospital,Chicalim,Vasco-da-Gama,Goa
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Sushma Constructions & others
56,green Valley,Alto,Porvorim-Goa
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE N.A.Britto PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MR. Shri. Jagdish Prabhudesai MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

It may be observed that if the C.P. Act, 1986, gives a consumer an additional remedy to enforce his rights before the Fora established under the Act, Section 27 of the same Act gives additional power to the fora to execute its orders, as held by the Apex Courtin state of Karnataka vs. Vishwabharati House Building Co-operative Society and others ,AIR 2003 SC 1043. On failure of the developer/JD No. 1 to hand possession of the premises 2 to 6 shall personally remain present, at the first instance, for explaining substance of accusation under Section 27(1) C.P. Act, 1986, on the next date.

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE N.A.Britto]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MR. Shri. Jagdish Prabhudesai]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.