Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/152/2014

Babu - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Sundaram Finance Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director & anr. - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. R. Rajarajan,

15 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/152/2014
( Date of Filing : 19 Sep 2014 )
 
1. Babu
NO. 3, SADASIVA RAO STREET, VAKIL ROAD, GOPICHETTIPALAYAM, ERODE DISTRICT-638 452
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Sundaram Finance Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director & anr.
NO. 21, PUTULLAS ROAD, CHENNAI-600 002
2. SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD., BRANCH MANAGER
I FLOOR, ALR PLAZA, NO. 39/23, BYRAPPA LANE, BANGALORE ROAD, KRISHNAGIRI-635 001
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 15 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

                 BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                           Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.152/2014

                                                        DATED THE 15TH  DAY OF NOVEMBER  2021

 

Babu,

S/o Jayapal,

No.3, Sadasiva Rao Street,

Vakil Road,

Gopichettipalayam,

Erode District- 638 452.

                                                                               .. Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd.,

    Rep by its Managing Director,

    No.21, Patullas Road,

    Chennai - 600 002.

 

2. M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd.,

    Rep by its Branch Manager,

    1 Floor, ALR Plaza,

    No.39/23, Byrappa Lane,

    Bangalore Road,

    Krishnagiri – 635001.

                                                                       .. Opposite Parties

 

 Counsel for the complainant                    : M/s. R. Raja Rajan

 Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2    : M/s.  Srinivasa Raghavan

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 15.11.2021 for hearing. Due to non-representation of the complainant, this Commission made the following order:-

                                                                                 Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant. Today this matter is posted for appearance of complainant and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list. When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for the complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon, the complainant was again not present. Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                                  Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.