NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/131/2008

GAGANDEEP SINGH BALA & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. SRI KALISWARI FIRE WORKS & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. KULDEEP SINGH

23 Jul 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

NEW DELHI

APPEAL NO. 119 OF 2008

(Against the Order dated 28/01/2008 in Complaint No. 42/1997 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. M/S. SRI KALISWARI FIRE WORKS & ORS. 5 - A, CHAIRMAN A SHAUNMUGO MADAR ROAD, SIVAKASI, TAMIL NADU	...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. G.S. BAL, ADVOCATE & ANOR. D-908-09, DHARMESH NAGAR, NADA ROAD, NAYA GAON , MOHALI PUNJAB 2. MASTER GAGANDEEP SINGH BAL RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 1299, SECTOR 44 - B, CHANDIGARH	...........Respondent(s)

APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2008

(Against the Order dated 28/01/2008 in Complaint No. 42/1997 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. GAGANDEEP SINGH BALA & ANR. RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.399, SECTOR -43-A, CHANDIGARH 2. G.S. BA,AL HOUSE NO. 399, SECTOR -43-A, CHANDIGARH -	...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S. SRI KALISWARI FIRE WORKS & ORS. 5-A, CHAIRMAN A, CHAIRMAN A SHAUNUGO MADAR ROAD, SIVAKASI, TAMIL NADU 2. THE MANAGER, M/S. SRI KALISWARI FIRE WORKS 5-A, CHAIRMAN A, CHAIRMAN A SHAUNUGO MADAR ROAD, S TAMIL NADU 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. SRI KALISWARI FIRE WORKS 5-A, CHAIRMAN A, CHAIRMAN A SHAUNUGO MADAR ROAD, S TAMIL NADU 4. M/S. RUMMY STORES BOOTH NO. 425, SECTOR -44-D, CHANDIGARH -	...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENT
	HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER
	HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Appellant :

Mr. S. Aravindh, Advocate

For the Respondent :

Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate

Dated : 23 Jul 2014

ORDER

We are happy to note that during the pendency of these appeals, with the intervention of learned counsel, the parties have agreed to settle the dispute, subject matter of these appeals, out of court. It is agreed that in addition to the amount (s) already deposited and withdrawn by the Respondent/Complainant, a further sum of Rs.5 lakhs shall be paid by the Appellant in FA No.119 of 2008 as full and final settlement of the claim made by the Complainant, which shall form part of the corpus fund for a trust to be formed by the Complainant for the welfare of visually challenged children.  The said amount shall be paid within two weeks from the date of communication by counsel for the Complainant to the Appellants, in the said appeal, about the formation of the trust and its name. It goes without saying that in view of the aforesaid amicable settlement, the complaint giving rise to the present appeals would not survive and as agreed, is dismissed.           Both the first appeals stand disposed of in the above terms.

......................J

D.K. JAIN

PRESIDENT

......................

VINEETA RAI

MEMBER

......................

VINAY KUMAR

MEMBER