West Bengal

StateCommission

IA/990/2019

HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Sneha Construction Co. (P) Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Debojit Dutta

18 Oct 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
Interlocutory Application No. IA/990/2019
( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2019 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/149/2016
 
1. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd.
10th Floor, Metro Towers, Ho Chi Minh Sarani, Kolkata - 700 071.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Sneha Construction Co. (P) Ltd.
Rep. by its authorised representative, Sri Amitava Goswami, S/o Sri Sri Rajeshwar Goswami, C/o Jamyrta Niwas, opp. Don Bosco School, Jyotinagar, Siliguri, Dist. Darjeeling.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. Debojit Dutta, Advocate
For the Respondent:
Dated : 18 Oct 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 20 date: 18-10-2019

Sri Shyamal Gupta, Member

This day is fixed for passing order in respect of IA/990/2019.

By filing this petition, it is submitted by the Petitioner/OP that though it submitted survey report along with the WV, in this case, certain facts are required to be established before this Commission for proper adjudication of this case for which, evidence is required to be adduced by the Surveyor without which OP would not be able to establish its defence properly before this Commission.  Accordingly, the OP prayed for due liberty to adduce evidence of the Surveyor.

By filing WO, it is submitted by the Complainant that, in this case, OP filed WV and evidence in the year 2017.  Subsequently, following due process of law, this Commission fixed 11-12-2018 for final hearing.  On the date fixed, at the prayer of the OP, the date of final hearing was refixed on 06-05-2019.  On that day too, hearing of the case could not be started in view of the resolution passed by the Bar Council of West Bengal. Thereafter, on 13-09-2019, the OP moved the instant IA.  Terming it as a dilatory tactics on the part of the OP, the Complainant prayed for summary rejection of the IA.

Having heard both sides and on perusal of the documents on record, we find that no plausible ground is shown by the OP to justify the necessity of filing evidence on behalf of the Surveyor concerned.  Although it asserted that ‘certain facts are required to be established before this Commission for proper adjudication of the case’, there is virtually no clarity as to what actually are those ‘certain facts’ and why the same is so crucial for proper adjudication of this case and lastly, why due steps were not taken in this regard two years ago. 

We cannot be oblivious of the fact that this beneficial legislation has been enacted for expeditious disposal of cases and in fact, time limit for disposal of cases has also been set out in the statute.  The complaint case was filed in the year 2016 and even after 3 years, the matter could not be disposed of for one reasons or the other.  In view of this, we do not deem it appropriate to turn the clock back at this stage, particularly when the inevitability of such move is not duly explained.

In view of this, we are constrained to reject this petition.  Fix 23-03-2020 for final hearing.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.