Circuit Bench Aurangabad

StateCommission

FA/13/83

Shri Sai Reddy Anna Reddy Yache - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. Shubh-Deep Construction & Others - Opp.Party(s)

Adv. B B Yenge

10 Apr 2013

ORDER

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.
CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
 
First Appeal No. FA/13/83
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/08/2011 in Case No. 406 to 412/2009 of District Aurangabad)
 
1. Shri Sai Reddy Anna Reddy Yache
Row House No.12 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
2. Shri Santosh S/o. Shivdas Shelgaonkar
Row House No.8 Shri Siddhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA,
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
3. Shri. Sanjay S/o. Dnyanoba Sanap
Row House No.27 Shri Siddhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
4. Shri. Sambhaji S/o. Nathrao Latpate
Row House No.14 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
5. Shri Tulshiram S/o. Venkatrao Shingade
Row House No.26 Shri Siddhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
6. Shri Kantrao S/o. Baburao Kare
Row House No.13 Shri Siddhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra.
7. Shri. Arun S/o. Annarao Patil
Row House No.11 Shri Siddhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S. Shubh-Deep Construction & Others
"Sara Pride" Shop No. 15, Ranjitnagar Kalda Corner,
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
2. Ganesh Tarachand Daulanpure
"Sara Pride" Shop No. 15, Ranjitnagar Kalda Corner
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
3. Ashish Vinod Agrawal
Mahesh Nagar Jalna Road
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
4. Rajkumar S/o. Manikchand Agrawal
Mandha Naka
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
5. Pramod Jamnalal Kasliwal
Diwan Deodi,
Aurangabad.
Maharashtra
6. The Administrative,CIDCO Waluj
CIDCO Waluj
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/13/51
 
1. Shri Sai Reddy Anna Reddy Yache
Row House No.12 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
2. Shri Santosh S/o. Shivdas Shelgaonkar
Row House No.8 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
3. Shri. Sanjay S/o. Dnyanoba Sanap
Row House No.27 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Auranganad
Maharashtra
4. Shri. Sambhaji S/o. Nathrao Lalpate
Row House No.12 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
5. Shri Tulsiram S/o. Venkatrao Shingade
Row House No.26 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
6. Shri Kantrao S/o. Baburao Kare
Row House No.13 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
7. Arun Annarao Patil
Row House No.11 Shri Sidhi Vinayak Vihar, New CIDCO Tisgaon Near MHADA
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S. Shubh Deep Construction & Others
"Sara Pride" Shop No. 15, Rajitnagar Kalda Corner
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
2. Ganesh Tarachand Daulanpure
"Sara Pride" , Rajitnagar Kalda Corner
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
3. Ashish Vinod Agrawal
Mahesh Nagar,Jalna Road
AUrangabad
Maharashtra
4. Rajkumar S/o. Manikchand Agrawal
Mandha Naka
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
5. Pramod Jamnalal Kasliwal
Diwan Deodi
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
6. The Administrative,CIDCO Waluj
CIDCO Waluj
Aurangabad
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. B.A.SHAIKH PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. UMA BORA MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. K.B.GAWALI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Adv. B B Yenge, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Adv.Shri.S.T.Agrawal, Advocate for the Respondent 1
 Adv.Shri.Anup R.Nikam, Advocate for the Respondent 1
ORDER

Date  : 10.04.2013

 

Per Mr.B.A.Shaikh, Hon`ble Presiding Judicial Member.

 

 

1.       Adv.Shri.B.B.Yenge present for appellants. Adv.Shri.S.T.Agrawal present for respondent No.1 & 3 to 5 and he filed purshis and he undertakes to file V.P.  Adv.Shri.N.R.Nikam present for respondent No.6 and he filed purshis and undertakes to file V.P. The said advocates have waived notices of this Commission.

 

2.       We have heard advocate of appellants and aforesaid respondents on the point of maintainability of the appeal as common appeal is filed by seven complaints in respect of common orders passed in seven complaints.  It is submitted by advocate of appellants that appeal is maintainable as common order has been passed in respect of the seven complaints filed by seven complainants.  Advocates of aforesaid respondents submitted that merely because common order is passed in several complaints, single appeal against common order is not maintainable. We also find that common appeal in respect of common order passed in seven complaints is not maintainable in law.  Seven separate appeals ought to have been filed for orders passed in respect of seven complaints.  Hence following order is passed.

                                                O   R    D    E    R

 

1.     Appeal is rejected as it is not maintainable.

2.     Appellants are at liberty to file separate seven appeals subject to period of limitation.

3.     No order as to cost.

4.     Copies of this order be issued to both the parties.

 

 

Pronounced and dictated on dt.10.04.2013.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. B.A.SHAIKH]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. UMA BORA]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.B.GAWALI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.