Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/97/2016

Pawan Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Shell India Markets Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director & anr. - Opp.Party(s)

R. Swarnavel & Asso.,

27 Oct 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/97/2016
( Date of Filing : 09 Jun 2016 )
 
1. Pawan Kumar
Plot No. 135, Door No. 29, 5th East Avenue, Kamaraj Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-41
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Shell India Markets Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director & anr.
Campus4A, RMZ Milenia Business Park, No. 143, Dr. M.G.R. Road, Kanchanchavady, Perungudi, Chennai-96
2. M/s. Varun Enterprises, M.D.,
Shell station, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Ekkattuthangal, Chennai-32
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

 CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.97/2016

                                           DATED THE 27TH  DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

 

 

Mr. Pawan Kumar,

Plot No.135,Door No.29,

5th East Avenue, Kamaraj Nagar,

Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai- 600 041.

                                                                              .. Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1) Shell India Markets Private Limited,

    Represented by its Managing Director,

    Campus 4A, RMZ Millenia Business Park,

    No.143, Dr. M.G.R Road,

    Kandanchavady, Perungudi, Chennai-600 096.

 

2) Varun Enterprises,

    Represented by its Managing Director,

    Shell Station,

    Jawaharlal Nehru Road, EKKATTUTHANGAL

    Chennai- 600 032 India. 

                                                                              .. Opposite Parties.

 

 Counsel for the complainant                    : M/s. R. Swarnavel

 Counsel for the opposite party 1              : M/s. King & Partridge

 For the opposite party 2                             : Exparte

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 27.10.2021 for hearing. Due to non-representation of the complainant, this Commission made the following order                                            

Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant and 1st Opposite party. Today this matter is posted for appearance of complainant and for filing written arguments of complainant and 1st opposite party and for arguments (list). When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon, the complainant was again not present. Written arguments of both also not filed. This matter is pending long time for appearance of complainant. Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                                  Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.