| DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE | | AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001 |
|
| |
| Complaint Case No. CC/56/2017 | | ( Date of Filing : 19 Aug 2017 ) |
| | | | 1. Ranjit Kumar Saran, aged 39 years | | S/o. Laxminarayan Saran, At/P.O- Achyutpur, P.S- Khaira, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. M/s. Shakti Traders, Prop. Sweta Gupta, Ganeswarpur | | Authorised Dealer, New Holland Fiat (India) Pvt. Ltd., Ganeswarpur, In front of Tentulia Thakurani Mandir, At- Januganj, P.S- Industrial Area, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 2. Priyanka Gupta, Prop. of M/s. Jai Bhawani Engineering Works, Ganeswarpur | | (Near Tentulia Thakurani Mandir), P.O- Januganj, P.S- Industrial Area, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 3. Sri Rabindra Kumar Parida, Assistant Agriculture Officer, Khaira | | At/P.O/P.S- Khaira, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 4. Deputy Agriculture Officer, Simulia | | At/P.O/P.S- Simulia, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 5. Authorised Signatory, Registered Office- SREI Equipment Finc. Ltd., Mumbai | | L & T House, N.M Mag, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400001. | | Maharashtra | | 6. S.R.E.I Equipment Finance Limited, Kolkata | | Head Office- Plot No.Y-10, Block E.P, Sector-V, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091. | | West Bengal |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| |
| BEFORE: | | | | HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT | | | HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER | |
| |
| PRESENT: | | | Sri Priyabrata Ray & others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | | | Sri Priyabrata Ray & others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | | | Sri Saroj Kumar Mohapatra & others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0 | |
| Dated : 09 May 2023 |
| Final Order / Judgement | The case record is posted today for hearing of the case. None present on behalf of the complainant and O.Ps No.3 & 4 nor any step is taken on their behalf. The Advocates for O.Ps No.1, 2 & 6 are present. The complainant is absent. On repeated calls, also the absentee parties did not turn up. As it appears from the case record, the case against O.P No.5 was dismissed, as shown in the order dated 21.08.2018. The complainant remained absent on 01.11.2017, 21.11.2017, 27.12.2017, 24.01.2018, 23.05.2018 and from 17.07.2018 till today and slept over the matter for a long period and no step is taken on his behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the complainant, it is clearly made out that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his case and unnecessarily wastes the valuable time of this Commission. On the other hand, the contesting Ops have vehemently urged that the complainant is not prosecuting his case since long for which they are unnecessarily sustained financial loss. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous. | |
| |
| | | [HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA] | PRESIDENT
| | | | | | [HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA] | MEMBER
| | | |
