Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/168/2018

N. Murugan, Thiruverkadu, Chennai-600077 - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Seven Star Parking Yard, Perumal Agaram, Thiruverkadu, Chennai-77 and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

S. Kannan

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

              BEFORE     Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                    Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                    Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

                                                                                         FA. No. 168/2018

(Against the order in C.C. No.30/2012 dated 12.6.2018 on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Thiruvallur)

 DATED THIS THE 31^st DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

N.Murugan,

Aged 45 years

S/o Nagappan,

No.65/51, Perumal Koil street,

Thiruverkadu, Chennai 600 077                           ..Appellant/complainant

 

                                              Vs

 

1.M/s Seven Star Parking Yard,

Perumal Agaram, Thiruverkadu Main Road,

Near Arch, Thiruverkadu, Chennai 600 077

 

2. M/s Indus Ind Bank Ltd,

Rep.by its Manager,

Old No. 115 & 116, New No.34,

G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar,

Chennai 600 017   

 

3. M/s Indus Ind Bank Ltd,

Rep.by its Authorised Manager,

General Thimmaya Road,

Contonment, Pune-411 001                                ..Respondents/opposite parties

 

Counsel for Appellant/complainant                 : M/s S.Kannan

Counsel for Respondents/opposite parties       :  M/s S.K.Moorthy

1^st Respondent                                             : served called absent

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for appearance of both and written arguments and for filing written arguments of appellant,R2 and R3 and for arguments(list) or for dismissal,  we made the following order in open court :-

                                               Docket order 

          No representation for both. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of appellant and R2 and R3 and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present, hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

  Sd/-                                                 Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL       S.KARUPPIAH                                           R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                   JUDL.MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT