NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4416/2009

CAPT. G.N. SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. SENIOR CITIZEN HOME COMPLEX & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. N.P. SINGH & MAHABIR SINGH MANGLA & ASSOCIATES

18 Dec 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 01 Dec 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4416/2009
(Against the Order dated 31/10/2008 in Appeal No. 251/2007 of the State Commission Uttaranchal)
1. CAPT. G.N. SHARMAR/o Block No. 6/4A, Senior Citizen Complex, 8, old Mussoorie Road, Rajpur,Dehra Dun-248009 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. M/S. SENIOR CITIZEN HOME COMPLEX & ANR.Welfare Society through its Secretary Office, , old Mussoorie Road, Rajpur,Dehra Dun-2480092. Shri Surender UppalR/o 16, old Survey Road, Dehra Dun ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 18 Dec 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 306 days which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petition.  Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 the consumer fora are required to decide the case in a summary manner within 90 days of its filing where no evidence is required to be


-2-

taken and within 150 days where the evidence is required to be taken.  In the present case, the delay of 306 days over and above the statutory period given for filing the revision petition, cannot be condoned without showing sufficient cause.  The only reason given for condonation of delay in the application is that the petitioner being a senior citizen of age 78 years old, was not aware that he can approach this Hon’ble Commission for redressal of his genuine grievance and due to his wife being in frequent indisposition and prolonged illness, he could not manage to file the revision petition earlier.

            We  are  not  satisfied  with the cause shown.  Application for condonation of delay is dismissed.  Consequently, revision petition is dismissed as barred by time. 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER