Complaint Case No. CC/605/2021 | ( Date of Filing : 29 Dec 2021 ) |
| | 1. Mr. Vinay B.S | S/o. Mr. Srikanta Gupta B.R, Aged about 40 Years, R/at No.199,1st Main Road, Sharda Colony, Basaveshwaranagar,Bengaluru-560079 |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
Versus | 1. M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Private Limited. & others | The Director, office at M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Private Limited,office at HMT Layout, Opp. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 | 2. Mr. Ashwin Hedge | The Director, office at M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Private Limited,office at HMT Layout, Opp. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 | 3. Mr. Dommaraju Subramanyam | The Director, office at M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Private Limited,office at HMT Layout, Opp. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 | 4. Mr.Korapativenkata Durga Prasad, | The Director, office at M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Private Limited,office at HMT Layout, Opp. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
Final Order / Judgement | Complaint filed on:29.12.2021 | Disposed on:23.09.2022 |
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT BANGALORE (URBAN) DATED 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 PRESENT:- SRI.K.S.BILAGI | : | PRESIDENT | SMT.RENUKADEVI DESHPANDE | : | MEMBER | SRI.H.JANARDHAN | : | MEMBER |
COMPLAINANT/S | Vinay B.S. S/o Srikanta Gupta B.R., Aged about 40 years, R/a No.199, 1st Main road, Sharda colony, Basaveshwara nagar, | (Sri M.Mohan Kumar, Adv.) | | OPPOSITE PARTY | 1.M/s Sanchaya Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., Registered office at: HMT layout, OPP. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 Rep. by its Directors (Sri S.Manjunath, Adv.) 2. Ashwin Hegde, The Director M/s Sanchaya Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., HMT layout, OPP. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 (Exparte) 3. Dommaraju Subramanyam, The Director, M/s Sanchaya Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., HMT layout, OPP. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 (Sri S.Manjunath, Adv.) 4. Korapativenka Durga Prasad, The Director Office HMT layout, OPP. BMTC Bus Depot, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru-560032 (Sri S.Manjunath, Adv.) |
ORDER SRI.K.S.BILAGI, PRESIDENT - This complaint has been filed under section 35 of C.P.Act, 2019 (herein after referred as “ACT”) for the following reliefs.
- To complete the project and hand over the flat no.404,4th floor, Amber Block, in the Tower D, in the Greens with all essential services and facilities, within15 days along with Occupancy certificate, Fire Department clearance, E-Katha certificate along with formation of Association of Allottees and transfer and convey the deed of declaration of common assets etc.,
- To pay compensation for delay from September 2015 at the rate of 18% per annum from the respective dates of payment of the sale consideration.
- To pay the Pre-EMI pending amount of Rs.7,40,505/- as on August 2021 along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum under repayment;,
- To pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- for mental agony and torture and harassment for deficiency of service within 15 days from the date of notice,
- To order to pay costs of Rs.50,000/-.
OR ALTERNATIVELY: In case not completion of the project and handing over the possession, the complainant seeks to exit from the project and seeks to:- - To refund of sum of Rs.20,34,165/- along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the respective date of payment till payment.
- To reimburse the unpaid Pre-EMI amount of Rs.7,40,505/- as on august and interest along with all future interest at the rate of 18% per annum until repayment.
- To pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- and such other reliefs.
2.The case of the complainant in brief is as under: The complainant having booked a apartment bearing no.404 with OPs entered into sale agreement and construction agreement for total sale consideration of Rs.21,18,069/- on 25.03.2013 and paid in all Rs.20,34,165/- in 14 installments. The complainant had booked the apartment under Pre-EMI scheme and he got loan sanctioned from ICICI bank to the tune of Rs.17,12,386/-. The complainant made of Rs.4,23,614/- by way of self contribution and Rs.16,10,551/- . loan proceeds was disbursed in favour of the complainant. The OPs paid only Rs.7,40,505/- and failed to pay Pre-EMI interest amount. The complainant has paid Rs.8,45,999/- as on August 2021 and OPs are liable to reimburse Rs.7,40,505/-. The OPs neither completed the project on or before December 2014 with an extension of 06 months nor delivered possession of the apartment as agreed under construction agreement. Therefore, the complainant called upon the OPs either to complete the project or refund an amount including Pre-EMI and damages by addressing by issuing legal notice dt.06.09.2021. The OPs failed to pay the said amount. Hence, this complaint. - In response to the notice, OP-2 failed to appear before this commission and OP-2 is placed exparte. OP-1,3 & 4 only appeared though their counsel and filed version. OP-1, 3 & 4 admitted the agreement of sale and construction agreement dt.25.03.2013 and receipt of Rs.20,34,165/- from the complainant and ICICI Bank.
- It is further case of the OPs that in all 780-800 interested purchasers failed to make payment. The completion of project is delayed for non payment of these purchasers and shortage of materials. There is no deficiency of service and negligence on the part of OPs. They request to dismiss the complaint.
- The complainant has filed his affidavit evidence and relies on 12 documents. Affidavit evidence of the authorized signatory of OP-1,3,4 has been filed and these OPs have relied on Exhibits R1 to R3.
- Heard the arguments. We perused records.
- The following points arise for our consideration are as under:-
- Whether the complainant proves deficiency in service on the part of the OPs?
- Whether the complainant is entitled for the reliefs as mentioned in the complaint?
- What order?
- Our answer to the above points are as under:
Point No.1 :-Affirmative. Point No.2 :-Affirmative in part Point no.3:-As per the final order. REASONS - Point No.1&2:. Even though parties are reiterated their respective contentions in their affidavit evidence. But documentary evidence produced by the both parties is not in dispute. Allotment letter Ex. P2 is not in dispute. It is also admitted that the complainant and OPs have entered into sale agreement and construction agreement on 25.03.2013 as per Ex. P3 and P4. Ex.P5 bunch of receipts for having received Rs.20,34,165/-. The Total sale consideration of the apartment bearing no.404 to the tune of Rs.21,18,069/- is not in dispute.
The complainant neither pleaded or proved his ready and willingness to pay balance consideration of Rs.86,000/-. Therefore, the complainant is not entitled to reliefs of possession with documents. The OPs have committed delay in completion of the project. Therefore, complainant is entitled to refund of Rs.20,34,165/- and Pre-EMI pending amount Rs.7,40,505/. Even though complainant claims interest 18% p.a., but the complainant is entitled to interest at 9% p.a. on these amount from the date of payment till realization in view of the decision The direct payment of Rs.4,23,614/-. In view of decision of Hon’ble Supreme court of India reported in (II)(2022)CPR(1) in the matter between Experian Developers Pvt.Ltd., V/s Sushma Ashok Shiroor. Hence, we answer point no.1 & 2 in affirmative in part. - Point no.3: In view of the discussions referred above, the complaint requires to be allowed in part. The OPs are liable to refund Rs.20,34,165/-, Rs.7,40,505/- Pre-EMI installment with interest at 9% P.A. from the date of respective payments till realization and payment of Rs.25,000/- towards cost of litigation. Interest is awarded in the form of compensation. Therefore, the complainant is not entitled to compensation under separate head. Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following
O R D E R - The complaint is allowed in part.
- The OPs shall refund Rs.20,34,165/- and pre-EMI amount of Rs.7,40,505/- with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of payment till realization.
- The OPs shall pay Rs.25,000/- towards cost of litigation.
- The OPs shall comply this order within 60 days from this date, failing which OPs shall pay interest at 12% p.a. after expiry of 60 days till realization on Rs.20,34,165/- and Rs.7,40,505/-.
- Furnish the copy of this order to both the parties and return extra pleadings with documents to the parties.
(Dictated to the Stenographer, got it transcribed and corrected, pronounced in the Open Commission on this 23rd day of July, 2022) (Renukadevi Deshpande) MEMBER | (H.Janardhan) MEMBER | (K.S.Bilagi) PRESIDENT |
Documents produced by the Complainant-P.W.1 are as follows: 1. | P1: Certificate under section 65(B) of Evidence Act. | 2. | P2: Copy of allotment letter dt.09.04.2013 | 3. | P3: Copy of sale agreement dt.25.05.2013 | 4. | P4: Copy of construction agreement dt.25.05.2013 | 5. | P5: Copy of payment receipts from page no.46 to 57 | 6. | P6: Copy of loan sanction letter. | 7. | P7: Copy of Pre-Emi Statement | 8. | P8: Copy of bunch of emails correspondences from page 62 to 69. | 9. | P9: Copy of legal notice dt.13.09.2021 | 10. | P10:Copy of postal receipt | 11. | P11: Copy of Postal Track Consignment | 12. | P12: Copy of report of RERA. |
Documents produced by the representative of opposite parties-1,3,4: 1. | R1: Copy of Board resolution | 2. | R2: Copy of Review Petition 1/2021 | 3. | R3: Copy of interim order passed in WP.5937/2021 |
(Renukadevi Deshpande) MEMBER | (H.Janardhan) MEMBER | (K.S.Bilagi) PRESIDENT |
| |