Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/08/1224

Shri. Abdul Hamid Kadar Chougule - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Sai Corporation - Opp.Party(s)

Poonam V. Makhijani & Ms. Reshma G. Patil

10 Jan 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/08/1224
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/07/43 of District Thane)
 
1. Shri. Abdul Hamid Kadar Chougule
B.E.S.T. Staff Quarters, Amrut Nagar, R. No. C/24, Ground Floor, Ghatkopar (West), Mumbai - 400 086.
Mumbai
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Sai Corporation
6, Vrundavan Apartment, Ground Floor, Murbad Road, Kalyan
Kalyan
Maharashtra
2. Mr. Santosh Kumar Goel, Partner of M/s. Sai Corporation
Mahavir Shopping Centre, 41, Shivaji Chowk, Kalyan (West)
3. Mr. Sunil Dutt Abhang
D/27, Municipal Optics, Vikhroli Park Site, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai 400 079.
Mumbai
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
 
PRESENT:
None for the appellant.
......for the Appellant
 
ORDER

Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          None is present for the appellant.  Respondents are not yet served.  On 12/08/2010 junior of Advocate Mhatre was absent since he was sick and therefore, Advocate Mr.Mhatre wanted time to produce packets which bore remarks “left” and then on 27/09/2010 Counsel for the appellant sought adjournment to take effective steps to supply correct address.  So, we directed issuance of fresh notice by RPAD and that we had directed him to take steps within 7 days, but Office note mentioned that appellant has not come with the required papers for service and notice was not issued.  There was lapse on the part of Advocate.  On 15/11/2010 Advocate Mr.Mhatre again sought time to take appropriate steps, but it appears that he has not taken any steps.  In the circumstances, we pass the following order :-

                   -: ORDER :-

1.       Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution and for default.

2.       No order as to costs.

3.       Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.