View 1147 Cases Against Parsvnath
View 981 Cases Against Parsvnath Developers
Marut Dhar filed a consumer case on 09 Feb 2018 against M/S. Parsvnath Developers Ltd. in the New Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/571/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 16 Feb 2018.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI
(DISTT. NEW DELHI),
‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,
NEW DELHI-110001
Case No.C.C./ 571/2017 Dated:
In the matter of:
Mr. Marut Dhar
Mrs. Ruby Dhar
Both R/o 137, Pocket-E,
Mayur Vihar, Phase-II,
Delhi-110091
…..Complainant
Versus
M/S Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
6th Floor, Arunachal building,
19, Barakhamba road,
New Deilhi-110001
Through its directors
.…… Opposite Parties
ARUN KUMAR ARYA - PRESIDENT
ORDER
The complainant has filed this complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and made the following prayer:-
After the Mediation report that the matter not settled, the arguments on behalf of complainant addressed by Ld. Counsel. During the course of deliberation, it is stated that complainants have made a payment of Rs. 15,66,378/- in respect of the shop in respect of which an agreement was executed.The Ld. counsel of thecomplainanton the issue of Pecuniary Jurisdiction argued that theprayer is not forpossession of shop and only the relief of refund of the amount paid with interest and compensation etc has been claimed therefore, thecomplaint is within the pecuniary Jurisdiction ofthis Forum.
We have given due consideration to the material placed before us and the arguments addressed along with relevant provisions of law.The aggregate of the cost of shop & the relief claimedis more than the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Forum and hold accordingly. The particulars of this case in the light of the decision of Hon’ble NCDRC in the matter of Tushar Batra & Anr. Vs. M/S Unitech Limited decided on 26/04/2017, Case no.-299 of 20 are as under:-
Before this District Forum on 18/12/2017
Brief statement of reasons for returning the complaint.
As per the judgement in the case of Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., the Hon’ble NCDRC has held that in case where even part of deficiency is to be removed the full value of the subject matter whether goods or services will be taken as the value of goods and services for deciding the pecuniary Jurisdiction. In the present complaint, the aggregate value of the alleged flat, damages and interest claimed exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this District Forum (i.e.) 20 Lacs.
Keeping in view provision of law and the law laid down by the Hon’ble NCDRC referred to above, we hold that this Forum lacks the pecuniary jurisdiction to hear and dispose of this case and accordingly we order return of the complaint to file it before the appropriate forum.
Copy of the order may be sent to the complainant to the case free of cost as statutorily required.
Announced in open Forum on 09/02/2018.
The orders be uploaded on www.confonet.nic.in.
File be consigned to record room.
(ARUN KUMAR ARYA)
(PRESIDENT)
(H M VYAS) (NIPUR CHANDNA)
MEMBER MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.