Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/107/2016

K. Subramanian - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Oragadam City Developers Pvt. Ltd.,& 4 Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

V. Balasubramanian

31 Jan 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

        BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                             Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 CC.No.107/2016

 

                                                                DATED THIS THE 31^st   DAY OF JANUARY 2023

 

1.K.Subramanian (deceased on 29.4.2018)

 

2. Smt.Visalam Subramanian (deceased on 10.3.2019)

 

Both resided at A-13,

Vivekanandha Nagar,

Dindugul – 624 007

 

3. S.Ananthakrishnan,

A-13, Vivekanandha Nagar,

Dindugul – 624 007

 

4. Mrs.Jayanthi Balasubramanian,

No.12, Lakshmipuram 2^nd street,

Lloyds Road, Chennai – 14

 

5. Mrs.Sasikala Venkatakrishnan,

1306, H Block, Bricade Gate Way,

Rajkumar Road, Bangalore                 ..3 to 5 petitioners/complainants 

(impleaded as per order in MP.No. 49/2020 by   order dated 11.8.2021 as legal heirs of deceased complainants 1 & 2)

 

Vs

1. M/s Oragadam City Deveopers Pvt.Ltd,

New No. 5, Old No.3, Giri Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017   

 

2. M/s New Town Housing

A partnership Firm,

New No.5,  Old No.3, Giri Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017   

 

3. M/s Value Build Homes,

A partnership Firm,

New No.5,  Old No.3, Giri Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017   

 

4. M/s Vilagam Housing,

A partnership Firm,

New No.5, Old No.3, Giri Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai -600 017   

 

5. M/s Frontier Housing Pvt Ltd,

New No.5, Old No.3, Giri Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai -600 017   

 

1 to 5 represented by their Power Agent

Mr.C.V.Lakshmanan,

M/s Oragadam City Developers Pvt Ltd,

New No.5, Old No.3, Giri Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai -600 017                                       ..Opposite parties 1 to 5

 

Counsel for the Complainant                            : M/s V.Balasubramaniam

Counsel for the opposite parties1 to 5               : M/s A.V.Arumugam

 

          This complaint is is coming up before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

 

  Docket order

          Both present. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, a joint memo of compromise has been filed signed by both the parties stating that the matter has been settled between the parties.

          In view of the joint memo, the complaint is disposed of. Joint memo of compromise shall form part of the order.

             Sd/-                                                                                                           Sd/-

  R  VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT