Orissa

Anugul

EA/3/2022

Sri Prabodh Kumar Swain - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd. Represented through the Divisional Manager - Opp.Party(s)

P.Sahu

03 Aug 2023

ORDER

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ANGUL
 
Execution Application No. EA/3/2022
( Date of Filing : 21 Sep 2022 )
In
CC/54/2010
 
1. Sri Prabodh Kumar Swain
At- T.P.M. Road, P.O-Hakimpada, P.S/Dist.-Angul
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd. Represented through the Divisional Manager
At-The Divisional Office at Hanuman Bazar, P.O/P.S/Dist.-Angul
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Saroj Kumar Sahoo PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Sasmita Kumari Rath MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 03 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

               The case  is put up  today for  passing necessary  order   on the Execution Petition  filed by the DHr who  was  complainant in C.C. No.54 of 2010. The  present JDr was the opp.party in the  aforesaid  complaint  case.  After hearing   both the parties in C.C No.54 of 2010  the then Learned President  of District Forum, Angul passed final order on 04.01.2011. The case filed by the complainant was allowed on contest and the opp.party was directed to pay Rs.5,47,770.00 along with compensation of Rs.20,000.00.The JDr-opp.party preferred First Appeal bearing  No. 67 of 2011 before the Hon’ble State Commission, Odisha which has  been disposed  by order dtd.21.01.2013. The Appeal was   allowed with modification. In the aforesaid order the Hon’ble State Commission directed the appellant  to pay an amount  of Rs.4,50,000.00 in addition to cost of Rs.20,000.00 instead of Rs.5,27,770.00  and  cost Rs.20,000.00  within  two month from the receipt of the order. The JDr-opp.party preferred  a Revision   against   the order passed by the  Hon’ble State Commission  which was  numbered as Revision Petition No.1782/2013 by the  Hon’ble National Commission and  disposed  of  by order  dtd.14.07.2022. The revision preferred by the JDr/opp.party /Appellant was dismissed. The extract of order passed by the Hon’ble National Commission runs as follows:-

The present revision being totally bereft of worth must fail. It stands dismissed.

The amount if any deposited by the insurance co with the District Commission in compliance of this Commission's Order dated 22.07.2014 along with interest if any accrued thereon shall be forthwith released by the District Commission to the complainant by way of 'payee's account only' demand draft as per the due procedure. The balance awarded amount shall be made good by the insurance co. within six weeks from today, failing which the District Commission shall undertake execution, for 'enforcement and for penalty, as per the law.

            The  aforesaid  order was passed  in  presence of the Learned Counsel  for  the JDr. Order was  also passed to  upload  on the  website  of the  Hon’ble NCDRC immediately. The petitioner of the complaint case Sri Prabodha Kumar Swain also communicated the aforesaid order to the  company of the  JDr immediately. Although  the  JDr has  received  the said  order, he  failed   to pay the  amount  to the   petitioner  as directed within the  stipulated  period. However, the insurance company deposited an amount of Rs.2,35,000.00 on 01.09.2022  through NEFT  in the  bank account  of the petitioner without  interest component. The  payment  was made beyond   six weeks  from 14.07.2022  i.e  after  50 days, for  which the  company of the JDr-opp.party  is liable  to pay interest  component  as directed  by the   Hon’ble  National Commission. As the order passed  by the Hon’ble National Commission  is not respected by the  JDr- opp.party , the petitioner  seeks  further  damage /penalty  as provided  under the Act. The DHr-petitioner  has prayed to  direct the JDr- opp.party   to pay the award  amount with upto date interest @ 15% per annum from the  date of order passed by the Hon’ble State Commission  till realisation   along with Rs.20,000.00 towards cost of  damages/penalty  as stipulated  U/s. 71 of the   Act.

 

2.       Notice  was issued to the JDr-opp.party and  in pursuance of  such notice the JDr- opp.party filed  show cause/ counter in the   execution  petition  filed by the DHr- petitioner.

 

3.       The case of the JDr-opp.party is that the petitioner has  communicated the order passed by the Hon’ble NDRC on 21.07.2022. Six weeks period would have been completed  on 01.09.2022, as 26.08.22 and 28.08.2022  were holidays being  4th Saturday and  Sunday. Thereafter  there were holidays for Ganesh Puja and  Nuakhai as per  N.I.Act. The  total  holidays were four days. The  opp.party  is  a Govt. of India Public  sector company. The Divisional office is the  operative  branch but as the  file was at NLV  Legal Cell New Delhi   , the office  which look after the appeal matter. After receiving the approval  order  from NLV, New Delhi on 24.08.2022, the operative branch started  processing  the  file  on 25.08.2022 for payment  within 6 weeks. The DHr-petitioner  received an amount of Rs.2,35,000.00  on 01.09.2022 through NEFT. The Hon’ble  NCDRC directed for payment of the  balance  awarded amount within 6 weeks  from the  date of  order. Accordingly the JDr-opp.party made necessary  arrangement  for payment of the  balance amount on 22.08.2022. Due to bank holidays the DHr-petitioner’s account was credited on 01.09.2022. There was no delay  at all  in  payment  by  the JDr-opp.aprty. The payment  was within the  time  fixed by Hon’ble NCDRC. If at all there  was  any delay  as alleged by the complainant, then  the  delay was unintentional and also due to unavoidable  circumstances. The JDr-opp.party   has  complied the order,  for  which the  execution petition  is not maintainable.

 

4.       Argument was heard  from the  Learned  Counsels  of  both the  parties  on 13.07.2023  and the case has been   posted today for  order.

 

5.       During  argument the Learned  Counsel for the DHr-  petitioner  submitted that the JDr- opp.party is  to pay interest @15 per annum on the award amount passed  by the Hon’ble State Commission, Odisha in C.C. No.54 of 2010 vide order  dtd.04.01.2011 till the full award  amount is paid. On the other hand  the Learned Counsel  who appeared on behalf of the JDr- opp.party has  argued that the appeal  is  a  continuous  process  of the suit and the  order passed by the Honb’le State Commission has  merged with   the order passed by the Hon’ble NCDRC in Revision Petition No. 1782/ 2013 . He  further  argued  that the  effective  date  of  judgement is  when the appeal has been disposed of by the appellant authority As the JDr- opp.party has  complied the order passed by the Hon’ble NCDRC , the order passed by the Hon’ble State Commission, Odisha is not  effective  one.

 

6.       Perused the  complaint petition filed in C.C. No. 54 of 2010  and the  show cause  filed by the opp.party. We have also perused the order passed by the Hon’ble District Forum, Hon’ble Sate Commission, Odisha, Hon’ble NCDRC.

 

7.       Admittedly  a complaint  filed  U/s. 12  of C.p.Act,1986 is not a  suit.  It is also  clear that the JDR- opp.party  has   approached  the Hon’ble NCDRC  not in appeal  as provided  U/s. 19  of C.P.Act,1986 .On the  other hand  he has   approached U/s. 21(b)  of C.P.Act, 1986 for which the  Hon’ble NCDRC called for the  record and   passed  appropriate order  in  consumer dispute which has been decided by the Hon’ble State Commission Odisha. So the order passed  by the  Hon’ble NCDRC   is  not  an order  in appeal  but an order on the Revision Petition  filed by the JDr- opp.party. Section -24  of the C.P .Act, 1986 provides as follows :-

          “Every order of a District Forum, the State Commission or the National Commission shall, if no appeal has been preferred against such order under the provisions of this Act, be final”.

 

            So  from the  materials  on record it is  clear that the order passed by the Hon’ble State Commission in F.A No.  67  of  2011  is final. The JDr-opp.party  has  not  preferred  any appeal  against  the order passed by the Hon’ble Sate Commission, Odisha. So the  JDr- opp.party is  bound to comply  the  order passed  by the  Hon’ble Sate Commission passed in C.C No.54 of 2010  dtd.21.01.2013 and 31.01.2013. By the  aforesaid order, the JDr- opp.party has been directed to pay a lump sum amount of  Rs.4,50,000.00  to the  DHr-petitioner  towards repairing   cost of the  vehicle  besides Rs.20,000.00 towards  compensation as ordered by the  Learned District Forum  within 2 months  of receipt of the order, failing which the  said  amount  would  carry interest @ 15% per annum till payment. The JDr-opp.party has not complied the  aforesaid order of the Hon’ble State Commission  ,Odisha within the time  given  to  him.  He has  also  not   paid the  award amount  Suomotu till  the disposal of the  Revision Petition by the  Hon’ble NCDRC.

8.         Hence order :-

           The JDr-opp.party  is directed  to pay  the balance  amount  after  calculating the  award amount Rs.4,70,000.00 (Rupees Four Lakh Seventy Thousand) only along with interest @15% per annum from the date of order passed by the Hon’ble  State Commission, Odisha in F.A No. 67 of 2011  till actual  payment is made.   

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Saroj Kumar Sahoo]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Sasmita Kumari Rath]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.