DIST. CONSUMER  DISPUTES  REDRESSAL  COMMISSION

NORTH 24 Pgs., BARASAT.

M. A.  CASE  NO.  85/2020

Arising out of the C.C. No- 49/2020

Date of Filing:                                                                                                Date of Disposal:

 21.09.2020                                                                                                        21.09.2020

Complainant/s :-                    1.         SMT. JAITA CHAKROBORTY ALIAS JAYITA

CHAKRABORTY, W/o Sri Jyotirmoy Chakroborty.

2.         SRI JYOTIRMOY CHAKROBORTY ALIAS JYOTIRMAY CHAKRABARTI, S/o Late Debiprosad Chakrabarti Both of Korar Bagan, P.o. + P.S. – Bongaon, Dist – North 24 Pgs, Pin – 743235.

=Vs=

O.P/s:-                                     1)         M/s Mousam Enterprise. P.S. – Barasat, Dist – North 24

Pgs, Kolkata – 700 126. Represented by its proprietor Sri JAYANTA BASU, S/o Late Shymal

Baran Bose of Santi Sadan, Kabi Sukanta Road, P.O. – Nabally, P.S. – Barasat, Dist – North 24

Pgs, Kolkata – 700 126

2)         Sri JAYANTA BASU, S/o Late Shymal

Baran Bose of Santi Sadan, Kabi Sukanta Road, P.O. – Nabally, P.S. – Barasat, Dist – North 24

Pgs, Kolkata – 700 126

                                                3)         SRI ARABINDA CHAKROBORTY

                                                4)         SRI BADAL CHAKROBORTY,  Both

sons of late Abani Mohan Chakroborty of 1397 Deshapriya Road, P.O. – Nabapally, P.S. – Barasat, Dist – North 24 Pgs Kolkata – 700 126

P R E S E N T  :-  Shri Karna Prasad Burman………..………....President.

  :-  Smt. Monisha Shaw………………………Member.

Order No- 04

            This M.A. 85/2020 is filed on petition U/s 38(8) of the C.P. Act 2019 praying for restraining the O.P. parties from alienating / transferring / parting of the ‘B’ Scheduled property of the petition. It is moved by the Ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the complainant. Ld. Advocate submitted that considering the urgency the instant petition may kindly be granted by way of restraining the Opposite Parties from transferring / alienating or parting the ‘B’ Scheduled property on the ground that during pendency of this case if the ‘B’ Scheduled property be transferred to any third party or altered in that event the purpose of this case be frustrated and the complainant be surely jeopardized. Heard him. Perused the complaint, the instant petition U/s 38(8) of the C.P. Act 2019 and the relevant documents. We find prima facie case is lying in favour of the complainant but we find no cause as to irreparable loss of the ‘B’ Scheduled property. Rather if the instant M.A. be granted in that event balance of inconvenience be created in future as the instant case stands on summary procedure.

Hence, the instant petition is considered and rejected.

Thus, the instant M.A. case is disposed of.

To date (11/11/2020).

Let plain copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost as per the CPR, 2005.

Dictated and Corrected by

Member                                                                                                                     

Member                                                                                                          President