West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/291/2021

Amiya Ranjan Laskar - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. Mediview Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Saumen Sekhar Ghosh

28 Sep 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/291/2021
( Date of Filing : 26 Jul 2021 )
 
1. Amiya Ranjan Laskar
11/3, Picnic Gardens Road, P.S. Tiljala, Kolkata-700039.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S. Mediview Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd.
74, Broad Street, P.S. Ballygunge, Kolkata-700019.
2. M/S. Nightingale Hospital
11, Shakespeare Sarani, P.S. Park Street, Kolkata-700071.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 28 Sep 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 04   Date-    28.09.2021

 

            Today is fixed for passing order on the point of admission.

            The matter was heard on 24.09.2021.

Having heard the Ld. Advocate for the complainant and on perusal of the contents of the petition of the complaint coupled with documents annexed thereto, we find that the complainant was admitted to OP-1 Mediview Nursing Home (P) Ltd. at 74, Broad Street, Kolkata-700019 with diarrhea and dehydration and discharged on 21.03.2021 at 1.58 PM.  The OP-1 raised bills and the complainant paid such bills amount. We also do not find any deficiency in service and/or unfair trade practice on the part of the OP-1. Treatment was given against money as the OP-1 is a private nursing home.

It is also true that the complainant took test of Covid-19 at OP-2 Nightingale Hospital, Kolkata and the Hospital Authority mentioned the age of the complainant as 25 instead of 75.  The complainant did not claim any relief against the OP-2  Nightingale Hospital, Kolkata and in the cause title of the complaint OP-2 has been implicated as Proforma OP.

In view of the above observation, we are not inclined to admit the complaint and the compliant is liable to be rejected.

Hence,

Ordered

That the complaint is rejected without any cost. The complainant may agitate his grievance before the competent authority.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.