Telangana

StateCommission

EA/11/2014

S. Rama Chandra Raju S/o Mr. Suryanarayana Raju - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd(formerly Known as M/s.Maytas Hill county (p) Ltd and another - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. V. Appa Rao

25 Oct 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
Execution Application No. EA/11/2014
In
 
1. S. Rama Chandra Raju S/o Mr. Suryanarayana Raju
R/o. 2216, Foot hill drive, Salt late city, Utah,84109,USA, Rep.by his GPA Holder, Mrs Savithri Pen Masta W/O Mr. Susba Raju, R/o. H.No LIG-45, Dharma Reddy Colony, Phase-I, JNTU Road, Kukatpally, Hyd
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd(formerly Known as M/s.Maytas Hill county (p) Ltd and another
, Rep.by MD Mr. ArunKumar Saha S/o Brindavas Chandra Saha, R/o. Mayor Hill County, Bachupally(V & P), Qutbullapur Mandal , RR Dist, Hyd- 72
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 25 Oct 2016
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION

EA No. 11 of 2014

In

 CC 67 of 2010

Between:

S.Ramachandra Raju,

S/o Mr. Suryanarayana Raju

R/o 2216, Foot Hill Drive, Salt Lake city, Utah, 84109, USA

Rep by his GPA holder Mrs. Savitri Penmatsa

W/o Mr. Subba Raju, R/o H.No. LILG – 45, Dharma Reddy Colony,

Phase –I, JNTU road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad …..      Petitioner\/complainant

 

And

 

  1. M/s. Maytas  Properties Ltd

Formerly known as M/s. Maytas Hill County (P)  Ltd

Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. Arun Kumar Saha

S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha,

R/o Maytas Hill County, Bachupally village and post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

 Hyderabad – 500 072.

 

  1. Mr. Arun Kumar Saha

S/o Mr. Brindavan Chandra Saha, age about 60 years,

Managing Director, M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd

R/o Maytas Hill County, Bachupally village and post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

Hyderabad – 500 072          …        Respondents/Ops 1 and 2.

 

  1. ICICI Bank Ltd

Begumpet Branch, rep b its Branch Manager

2nd floor, East Wing ICICI Towers

Road no.1, Begumpet,

Hyderabad – 500016                                   ..          proposed respondent.

 

 

Counsel for the petitioner                                      :           M/s. V. Appa Rao

 

Counsel for the Respondent                                 :           M/s. K. Vishweshwara Reddy for

                                                                                                R1 and R2

                                    M/s. S. Nagesh Reddy

 

Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                    And

 

                                                            Sri Patil Vithal Rao, Member

 

 

                                    TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH  DAY OF OCTOBER

                                                            TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

           

                         Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )

 

                                                            *******

 

  1. This is an application   filed by the complainant U/s.27  of the Consumer Protection Act seeking to initiate necessary proceedings against the respondents/opposite parties for non-compliance of the common orders dated 27.4.2012 passed in CC 67 of 2010 on the file of this Commission and orders dated 08.07.2013 passed in FA No. 357 of 2012 on the file of the Hon’ble National Commission and punish them  as per the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.

 

  1.  Counsel on both sides present. Heard.

 

  1. Counsel for the first opposite party filed Memo stating that he is  depositing cheque bearing No. 184443ated 24.10.2016 for an amount of Rs.18,42,656/- (Rupees Eighteen Lakhs Forty Two Thousand Six Fifty six only)   towards EMI Interest amount payable to complainant with unregistered Unit who availed housing loan from ICICI Bank as per the statement provided by the said bank.  Counsel on both sides agreed that they have no claim against the respondents/opposite parties and requested to dispose of the case towards full and final settlement as settled out of court..

 

  1. In view of the above facts and circumstances Memo recorded and  the E.A. is closed as settled out of court towards full and final settlement. Since E.A. is closed, EAIA 472 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous. No costs

 

 

PRESIDENT            MEMBER

            DATED : 25.10.2016.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.