BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD

E.A.8/2014

in

CC 117/2010

Between :

Sanjay Thota, S/o T Anil Kumar

Aged about 37 years,

Occ : Software employee

R/o Flat No. A-124,

Western Plaza, O.U. Staff colony,

Dargah Hussain Shawali ( Near Manikonda )

Hyderabad – 500 032                                              …Petitioner/complainant

And

1. M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd, ( Now known as

Hill County (P) Ltd rep by its Managing Director

Regd. Office at Bachupally village and Post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

Hyderabad – 500 072

Rep by its Managing Director

2. Mr. M.D. Khattar

Managing Director

M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd

( now known as Hill County Properties Limited

Regd. Office at Hill country,

Bachupally Village & Post

Qutbhullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy district

Hyderabad – 500 072                                  ..Respondents/opposite parties

3. Mr. Arun K. Saha,

Director, Mayatas Properties Limited

( Now known as Hill County Properties Limited )

Regd office at Hill Country, Bachupally,

Hyderabad – 500 072.

4. The State Bank of India

Rep by its City Case Officer

Stressed Assets Recovery Branch (SARB)

2^nd floor, APSRTC complex,

Commuter Centre ( Bus Terminal Complex)

Koti, Hyderabad -500 095.

Counsel for the Petitioner                          :           M/s. Prabhakar Sripad

Counsel for the Respondents                   :           M/s. K. Visweswar Reddy for R1 to 3

                                                                                    M/s. V. Srikrishnudu for OP 4.

Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH  DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

                                               Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, Hon’ble President )

                                                                                                      *****

1. This  Execution  Application is  filed by the petitioners/complainants  U/s. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act to initiate necessary proceedings against all respondents/opposite parties and punish them as per Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act for not complying with the order of the State Commission dated 24.07.2013 in CC No. 117 of 2010.

2. Heard the counsel on both sides.

3. Counsel for the respondent no.4 Bank filed affidavit along with Joint Memo stating that the entire claim amount of Rs.7,18,403/- ( Rupees Seven Lakhs Eighteen Thousand Four Hundread and Three only )  was paid by the Bank to the complainants towards full and final settlement. Hence the E.A. stands disposed of, i.e., dismissed as withdrawn.

                                                                                                            PRESIDENT.