Subrata Das, Kakdwip. filed a consumer case on 02 Dec 2016 against M/S. Manasi Enterprise. Kakdwip. in the South 24 Parganas Consumer Court. The case no is CC/19/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 06 Dec 2016.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPLUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
SOUTH 24 – PARGANAS , AMANTRAN BAZAR, BARUIPUR, KOLKATA-700 0144
C.C. CASE NO. _19_ OF ___2016__
DATE OF FILING : _29.2.2016__ DATE OF PASSING JUDGEMENT: 02/12/2016
Present : President : Udayan Mukhopadhyay
Member(s) : Subrata Sarker
COMPLAINANT : Subrata Das, Kakdwip Purbagangadharpur, South 24-Parganas, pin-743347
-VERSUS -
O.P/O.Ps : M/s Manasi Enterprise, P.O & P.S Kakdwip, Kakdwip Young Staff Road, Near Bank of Baroda , South 24-Parganas, Pin-743347
_______________________________________________________________________
J U D G E M E N T
Sri Subrata Sarker, Member
This is an application under section 12 of the C.P Act 1986 filed by the complainant on the ground he purchased Four Batteries from M/s Manasi Enterprise manufactured by Base International Ltd. Company ( Model-BEX 1000) at the cost of Rs. 24000/- for use in his E-Rickshaw. The batteries were six months replacement warranty. From the beginning of purchase of the batteries the complainant marked that the vehicle is getting low mileage. He also checked his Electrical Wiring and came to know that all other parts of his vehicle are o.k excepting the batteries. He repeatedly complained before the O.P and they charged the batteries make by another company. The O.P has kept the original purchased batteries along with warranty cards with them, for which, the complainant faced a huge financial loss.
The O.P contested the case b filing written version and have denied all the allegations leveled against him. The complainant did not appear from the very beginning of the case.
Point for decision in this case is whether there is any deficiency in service or unfair trade practice on the part of the O.P.
Decision with reasons
The O.P namely M/s Manasi Enterprise is a retailer shop. The complainant purchased four pieces of Base Battery on 29.8.2015 vide challan no.17/2015-16 dated 29.8.2015 from M/s Manasi Enterprise , wherein in the place of particulars of the battery it has been mentioned “1 BASE BATTERY, BDX-1000”. But the complaint is regarding “BEX-1000” batteries, which are of separate
model, for which it is
Ordered
That the application filed under section 12 of the C.P Act, 1986 is dismissed on contest against the O.P as the Model number of the batteries as complained and the Model no. mentioned in the submitted challan differs each other. But in the sorry state of affairs we restrain ourselves from imposing any cost treating the complainant as a vexatious complaint in view of Section 26 of the C.P Act, 1986.
Let a plain copy of this order be served upon the O.P through speed post and to the complainant free of cost.
Member President
Dictated and corrected by me
Member
The judgement in separate sheet is ready and is delivered in open Forum. As it is ,
Ordered
That the application filed under section 12 of the C.P Act, 1986 is dismissed on contest against the O.P as the Model number of the batteries as complained and the Model no. mentioned in the submitted challan differs each other. But in the sorry state of affairs we restrain ourselves from imposing any cost treating the complainant as a vexatious complaint in view of Section 26 of the C.P Act, 1986.
Let a plain copy of this order be served upon the O.P through speed post and to the complainant free of cost.
Member President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.