Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/58/2018

Sri Sagar Bindhani, aged about 31 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Manager, AMW Automobiles Motors Ltd., Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Bhagirathi Rout & others

22 Apr 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/58/2018
( Date of Filing : 30 Jul 2018 )
 
1. Sri Sagar Bindhani, aged about 31 years
S/o. Late Ratnakara Bindhani, At- Chasakhand, P.O- Padagan, P.S- Nilgiri, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Manager, AMW Automobiles Motors Ltd., Balasore
Located at Salabani, Near Januganj Golei, P.S- Industrial, Dist- Balasore
Odisha
2. M/s. Divisional Manager, AMW Automobiles Motors Ltd., Kolkata
Vintage House, Near Abhinav Bharti School, 12, Pretoria Street, Opp. Hotel Astor, Camac Street Crossing, Kolkata-700071.
West Bengal
3. M/s. General Manager, AMW Motors Ltd., Mumbai
7th Floor, Tower-1, Equinox Business Park (Peninsula Techno Park), Off Bandra-Kurla Complex, L.B.S Marg, Mumbai-400070.
Maharashtra
4. M/s. Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Januganj
At/P.O- Januganj Golei, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
5. M/s. Divisional Manager, State Bank of India, Balasore
At/P.O/Dist- Balasore-756001.
Odisha
6. M/s. General Manager, State Bank of India, Bhubaneswar
III/1, Pt. Jawaharlal Neheru Marg, Bhubaneswar-751001.
Khurda
Odisha
7. M/s. CEO, State Bank Bhavan, Mumbai
Madame Cama Marg, Mumbai-400021.
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri P Kanungo, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 22 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.P No.4 is present & files hazira. O.P No.6 is absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.P No.4 was appeared & filed w/v and the case against O.Ps No.1, 2, 3, 5 & 7 was dismissed. As the notice against O.P No.6 was sufficient & he neither appeared nor filed w/v till yet, hence the O.P No.6 is set ex-parte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 04.09.18 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired & the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.