Delhi

New Delhi

CC/700/2008

Yugal Kishore - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. Mamta Chandra Advocate & Anr. - Opp.Party(s)

28 Apr 2015

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI

(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR,

VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,

NEW DELHI-110002.

 

Case No.CC/181/10                                                                                                                                                                                Dated:

In the matter of:

SHRI YUGAL KISHORE

S/O SH. MANIK LALJI BHATTAD,

R/O SHIV SADAN, TEKDI ROAD, SITABULDI, NAGPUR-12 MAHARASHTRA

……..COMPLAINANT

 

VERSUS

  1. SMT. MAMTA CHANDRA, ADVOCATE

          R/O AG-I/51/A, VIKAS PURI,

          NEW DELHI-18

  1. SHRI HEMANT SHARMA, ADVOCATE,

          R/O FLAT NO.1100, BABA KHARAK SINGH MARG, NEAR GOL DAKKHANA,

          PANDIT NEHRU MARG, NEW DELHI.

OPPOSITE PARTIES

 

ORDER

President: C.K CHATURVEDI

The complaint is against two advocates OP-1 & OP-2, who were engaged by the complainant to file an SLP.   It is alleged that SLP was filed which remained in objection/scrutiny in the Registry, which was not attended by OPs.  He moved an application in the Supreme Court seeking discharge of AORs engaged. Alleging that SLP was dismissed because of non-appearance of OPs, the complainant of deficiencies is filed.  The OPs have filed a reply that fee was settled of Rs.25,000/- for miscellaneous expenses.  It is stated that Supreme Court on 9.1.08, dismissed the SLP on merits after condoning delay, and prayer for discharge of advocates was rejected and Counsel for complainant appeared, who was heard and SLP was dismissed (Copy of SC order is placed on record).  Complainant has not rebutted these facts by filing any rejoinder.  We have considered the matter evidence and perused the material on the record.     In our considered view no case for deficiency on part of OPs is made out on un-rebutted facts. The case is dismissed and file sent to Record Room.

 

Copy of the order be sent to the parties free of cost.

 

 

        Pronounced in open Court on 28.04.2015.

 

 

 

(C.K.CHATURVEDI)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

(S.R. CHAUDHARY)         (RITU GARODIA)

MEMBER                          MEMBER

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.