View 149 Cases Against Makemytrip
Vybhav Deraje filed a consumer case on 08 Apr 2019 against M/S. Makemytrip India Pvt.Ltd. in the New Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/827/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 29 Apr 2019.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI
(DISTT. NEW DELHI),
‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,
NEW DELHI-110001
Case No.C.C./827/2014 Dated:
In the matter of:
DR. VYBHAV DERAJE
S/o Shri Srinivasa Rao Deraji
R/o 29/133, Second Floor,
West Patel Nagar,
New Delhi-110008
…… Complainant
Versus
F-26, First floor, Inner Circle,
Opposite Palika Bazaar parking
Connaught Place, New Delhi
Tower ‘A’, S P Infocity,
243, Udyog Vihar, Phase – I,
Gurgaon, Haryana – 122016, India.
…….Opposite Party
H.M. VYAS – MEMBER
ORDER
The complainant has filed this complaint under Section12(a) of the Consumer Protection Act against the OP’s mainly Make My Trip (India Pvt. Ltd.). It is alleged that the complainant booked package to online for self and his wife. The tour was in the period 08.09.2014 to 12.09.2014 which included hotel stay. The purpose was for ensuing there is an exam of MRCS and the FRCA respectively for self and his wife to be held in London on 09.09.2014. The tour was booked on 13.12.2013 i.e. more than 9 months before the commencement of their journey and paid a sum of Rs. 1,13,707.80/- through credit card. On 01.01.2014, there were certain changes and the flight schedule and alternate their travel plans. The OP informed the complainant that the existing Air-tickets would remain valid and would be revalidated at airport. On 14.07.2014, the OP informed the complainant revised timings of the flights for journey to London and seen the revised E- Air tickets and Hotel vouchers. On 06.09.2014, complainant revised a call from Oman Air, and demanded passport details which were provided just before a day journey i.e. on 07.09.2014, the OP informed the complainants by email that the flights booked have been cancelled and the complainant could call tall free no.(1-8000-102-8747 and 1-800-11-8747)or the said airline reservation for alternative options or for refund/ confirmation. The representatives of OP on phone and persuasion a phone reassured regarding his air- ticket and arranged e-air tickets as per revised schedule programme. On 08.09.2014, when the complainant and his wife reached airport on 4:15 AM to board the flight, the staff of Oman Air informed the complainants that the booking had been cancelled by the respondent OP, the customer care personnel of OP on duty at airport premised complaint to resolve the issue in 2 hours time and by 9 AM he would get a call. Instead of helping the complainant the staff of OP became rude alleging that the complainant did not reach the airport in time. Since, the complainant and his wife had to appear in exam to be held in the next day at London, Air- India tickets were purchased for self and his wife for Rs. 1,53,000/- by using 4 credit card alleging in services on various occasions as referred here in above the complainant as prayed for as under:-
The OP filed written statement/ version denying all allegations and prayed for dismissal of the complaint. It is said that the OP had no control over the functioning of OMAN Airlines and the cancellation of flight, rescheduling the flights were not under the control of OP’s and as such the allegations of deficiency in service against the OP is substance. Further, it is stated that OP simply acted as facilitator to book the desired flight tickets for the complainants in OMAN Air (WY) Airlines. Being service facilitator the OP can only book the confirm tickets and supply it user as has been done admittedly in this case. In booking online there remains no manual or human interference from the hand of OPs. It is also said that the OP being a general and facilitator cannot be held liable no provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872. The user agreement available on website is applicable to the complainant and as such the OP is not liable.
The complainant has filed evidence by way of affidavit and both the parties filed their written submissions. Oral arguments also addressed by both the parties. We have perused the record placed before us and the submissions of the parties with relevant provision of law. The Ld. Counsel for the complainant has solely relied upon and contended in view of the tickets of the complaint and the documents annexed here with supportive evidence in affidavit.
On the other hand, the Ld. Counsel of the OP as prayed for dismissal by the complaint as the OP being a general cannot be held respectively for the act of principle. It is argued that the OP has no command over the working and of the OMAN Airlines. Therefore, the complaint is not maintainable against the OP. On this issue we are guided by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case appeal (CIBIL) 6113/1995 titled as
Copy of the order may be forwarded to the parties to the case free of cost as statutorily required.
Announced in open Forum on 08/04/2019
The orders be uploaded on www.confonet.nic.in
File be consigned to record room.
(ARUN KUMAR ARYA)
PRESIDENT
(NIPUR CHANDNA) (HM VYAS)
MEMBER MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.