Orissa

StateCommission

A/454/2010

M/s. Utkal Machinery, - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s. Maa santoshi Binding Works, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. U.C. Patnaik & Assoc.

30 Jan 2023

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ODISHA, CUTTACK
 
First Appeal No. A/454/2010
( Date of Filing : 14 Jan 2010 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/11/2009 in Case No. CC/239/2009 of District Cuttak)
 
1. M/s. Utkal Machinery,
represented through its Proprietor, Ari Amit Das, Dagarpara, Chandini Chowk, Dist- Cuttack.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s. Maa santoshi Binding Works,
represeted through its Proprietor, Sri Durga Prasanna Rath, Bidanasi, Nua Sahi, Bidanasi,Dist- Cuttack.
2. State Bank of India,
At- College Square, Dist- Cuttack.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kumar Mohapatra. PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Hemanta Kumar Mohanty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:M/s. U.C. Patnaik & Assoc., Advocate for the Appellant 1
 M/s. G. Acharya & Assoc., Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 30 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement
 Learned Counsel Mr. Santosh Sahoo is present on behalf of Goutam Kumar Acharya, Senior Advocate and filed  an authorization  letter in which Mr. Goutam Kumar Acharya, Senior Advocate has authorised Sri Santosh Sahoo, Advocate to appear on his behalf to identify the Complainant, same is kept in record. In the special facts and circumstances the same is allowed.
     To-day, Sri Durga Prasanna Rath/Respondent No.1/Complainant is present in person along with the identity proof  (Aadhaar card duly attested by him) along with learned Counsel Mr. Santosh Sahoo and received the Demand Draft drawn on HDFC BANK bearing No.000753 dt.16-01-2023 amounting to Rs.95,375/-(Rupees ninety five thousand three hundred seventy five only) endorsing the same in the order-sheet(his signature identified by Santosh Sahoo, Advocate), which was filed by the Appellant vide memo dt.17-01-2022 before this Commission towards full and final settlement of the claim amount. 
      Photo copy of Demand Draft duly signed by Complainant acknowledging receipt of original Demand Draft be kept in record.
In view of such fact the appeal is disposed of accordingly.Statutory amount may be refunded to the Appellant  on proper  identification.
Send back the DFR.
       
      Statutory amount may be refunded to the Appellant  on proper  identification.
      Send back the DFR.
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kumar Mohapatra.]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Hemanta Kumar Mohanty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.