West Bengal

Hooghly

CC/176/2024

SUBHASIS CHAKRABORTY - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S. M POKKET FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

SAUMEN NANDI

27 Aug 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2021
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPOSITE PARTY
 
Complaint Case No. CC/176/2024
( Date of Filing : 20 Aug 2024 )
 
1. SUBHASIS CHAKRABORTY
340, PIPULPATI, KADAMTALA, PO AND PS- CHINSURAH, HOOGHLY-712103
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S. M POKKET FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.
PS- SRIJAN CORPORATE PARK, TOWER-1, GP BLOCK, SEC-V, KOL-91
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
2. GAURAV JALAN
UNIT-1204, PS- SRIJAN CORPORATE, TOWER-1, GP BLOCK, SEC-V, KOL-91
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
3. CIBIL
TOWER-2A, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, ELPHINSTONE RD., MUMBAI-400013
MUMBAI
MAHARASTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Aug 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Today is fixed for admission hearing.

Complainant side is found present and ready.

Heard ld. advocate for the complainant side.  Considered submission.

In course of hearing the complainant side has given emphasis on the documents which have been annexed alongwith the complaint petition.

On the background of the above noted position this District Commission after going through the material of this case record finds that the complainant is not at all a consumer under the Ops.  Moreso the allegations which have been described in the complaint petition is highlighting that the offence of fraud has been practised upon the complainant.  But fact remains that for the purpose of getting relief in respect of the offence of fraud the complainant has the liberty of approaching before the criminal court.  In this regard it is important to note that this District Commission has no scope of determine the issue as to whether the offence of fraud has been practised upon the complainant in a summary trial procedure.

Considering all the above noted factors this District Commission finds that this is not a fit case for admission.

As a result of which this complaint case is not admitted and it is dismissed.

No order is passed as to cost.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.