Order No:02                                                                                                    Date:   21 /05/2024

Today is fixed for admission hearing.  Complainant side is found present.  Heard Ld. Advocate of the complainant side.

Perused the complaint petition.  Examined the documents filed by the complainant side.

On close compare of the complaint petition with the documents filed by the complainant side it appears that there is series discrepancy in between the fact pleaded and documents filed.  More so, on the basis of the document which has been marked as Annexure A (money receipt) it cannot be said that the complainant is a consumer under the OPs.  Moreover, in this said document (Annexure A) it is revealed that 90,000 bricks had to be supplied but from the Annexure B it is revealed that 30,000 bricks had to be supplied to the complainant.  These gross differences of the content of these two documents have not been clarified.

Hardly, complainant can initiate money suit against the OPs before the Ld. Civil Court.

It is crystal clear that this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain  this complaint case and this complaint case is not maintainable.

So, this complaint case is not admitted and it is dismissed.

Dictated & corrected by me

President